Wimbledon 1 v Kingston 1, Surrey League division 1 match played at St Winifride’s Church Hall, Wimbledon on 15 February 2024
Confidence in advance of this match was not high, given the depleted team we were able to field: Thursday is an inconvenient evening for several regulars, and illness took out Vladimir Li and Julian Way in the 24 hours before the match. Some team-mates thought our situation resembled that of Henry V before Agincourt:
O that we had now hereBut one ten thousand of those men in England that do no work today. What’s he that wishes so? …. The fewer men the greater share of honour.
That was perhaps an exaggeration: Kingston Chess Club does not yet have 10,000 members; Nick Grey and Charlie Cooke, stepping in at short notice, ensured we had as many players as Wimbledon; and the ratings of the two sides were almost equal. But if the thought helped stiffen our sinews it was a good one.
Charlie Cooke faced an uphill battle on board 8 with Black against the higher-rated John Polanyk. Having neutralised a dangerous-looking attack, a small slip allowed an exchange sacrifice which eventually won at least a piece. Jon Eckert and Nick Grey on boards 6 and 7 drew relatively early. Nick was frustrated that his edge from a better pawn structure did not crystallise into a win, but his was one of the boards where we were outrated, so this was nevertheless an important contribution.
Alan Scrimgour had found himself in a line of the French Defence known better by his opponent. Kings castled on opposite sides, and Alan sacrificed the exchange to try to drum up an attack; he accepted a draw offer when he realised that there was not much there. John Foley equalised the score with a convincing win with black against Wimbledon secretary Gordon Rennie. He has analysed this in more depth in the Games section. From my observation point on the next board, he built up the pressure impressively to reach this position after 22 Re3.
My own game finished shortly after John’s. At the time, I thought it had been an anodyne draw, with my opponent successfully neutralising the slight disadvantage of an isolated pawn. Imagine my frustration when Stockfish showed me three distinct winning opportunities I had missed, each of them instructive.
That left the scores level at 3-3, with Kingston apparently slightly worse on both remaining boards. Luca Buanne, on his league debut, faced Dan Rosen’s Grand Prix attack. This game, which was a tense but fairly balanced struggle from the outset, is provided in full in the Games section, with annotations by Luca and John Foley. The rest of the team started to focus on his game around this critical moment, after 37. Rc1 by White.
So it all came down to board 1. Peter Lalić, against the IM Alberto Suarez Real, played a trademark queenless middle game. Around the point the other games were over, he was a pawn down but solid and with reasonable activity, and his chances to hold were improved because his opponent was down to a minute on the clock while Peter still had more than five.
Thus we won the match, securing our position in division 1 and (such is the closeness of the race) keeping us in with an outside shot at the title. To beat a 2400+ IM in that ending starting from a pawn down was an epic performance. Peter will remember with advantages what feats he did that day[1].
Peter Andrews, Kingston captain in Surrey division 1
[1] Shakespeare was of course expert in the pressures and rewards of Surrey League chess.
Richmond B v Kingston B, Thames Valley division 2 match played at the Adelaide pub, Teddington on 13 February 2024
We arrived at the Adelaide pub in Teddington to be met by a very strong Richmond B side. Richmond’s A team are struggling in the top division of the Thames Valley League, and apparently their cunning plan is to put out strong teams in division 2 to compete for promotion in order to give them a safety net in case the unthinkable happens. This meant that their bottom board was higher rated than our third.
With this probably playing on my mind, given the 200-point rating disparity I faced against my opponent Bertie Barlow on board 3, I offered a draw after 25 moves when I felt Bertie had equalised as Black in the Scandinavian Defence and had thwarted my main plan to attack down the queenside. He accepted.
Alan Scrimgour drew shortly after on board 2 against John Burke. He felt he had equalised, but could see a flurry of exchanges that he felt left him without much of a plan to make progress and offered a draw which was duly accepted.
Jameel Jameel, a newcomer to the club this season, produced the fireworks of the night, wrapping up an impressive 19-move victory on board 6. He played the Accelerated Dragon, and, with his opponent castling queenside, Jameel went for the kill after the c3 pawn was ominously pushed. With White cramped in the corner, Jameel was able to sac his queen on a2 and mate on the flank with his lifted rook, with all flight squares covered by his bishop and his opponent’s pieces. A lovely sequence and a great victory for Jameel, who is coming on leaps and bounds. This is Jameel’s first published game.
Nick Grey looked to be doomed as Sampson Low got the better of the opening, stopping Nick from castling and winning a pawn. But these dynamic positions are the ones Nick likes and he managed to get some tricky counterplay that, if played incorrectly, could have been disastrous for Sampson. Sampson negotiated the situation well, but Nick had regained equality and a draw was agreed, with neither side fancying the unclear endgame.
David Shalom played accurately against Alastair Armstrong on board 5, building up a nice edge after he managed to blunt his opponent’s early g5, which led to a big hole in his kingside. However, David felt he didn’t manage the position well, and the game flipped suddenly, with the Richmond player capitalising on some unsound tactics. This levelled the match at 2.5-2.5.
The last game to finish was on top board between John Foley and Maxim Dunn. John was pressing down the kingside with a chain of pawns dominating the white squares and doubled rooks on the h-file. However, Maxim defended the position well, managing to mitigate John’s attack and, as John fell into time trouble, picking up a pawn on the queenside. Running out of good moves, John flagged, Maxim was victorious and Richmond had prevailed.
Gregor Smith, Kingston captain in Thames Valley division 2
Kingston v Richmond, Thames Valley Knockout semi-final played at the Willoughby Arms, Kingston on 12February 2024
Kingston were keen to retain the trophy we won last year when we beat Harrow in the final. However, we knew this would be a tough match, as only recently our first team were held to a 3-3 draw by Richmond A in Thames Valley division 1– a match which at one point they had looked nailed on to win.
We had strengthened our team with the inclusion of David Maycock and Peter Andrews, and we anticipated that Richmond would do the same. Their surprise inclusion was Casper Bates, who plays for the Richmond London League team but is not a Thames Valley regular, on board 3. Peter Lalić’s unorthodox opening, giving up a pawn, created the sort of unbalanced position in which Peter thrives. However, his opponent advanced his h-pawn, and Peter eventually ran out of time trying to stop the pawn promotion.
A couple of decisive games, one for each side, are discussed below.
This was a hard-fought match deservedly won by Richmond, who seemed to have an edge for most of the playing session.
Alan Scrimgour, Kingston captain in the Thames Valley Knockout
On the same evening, packed into the upstairs room at the Willoughby, Kingston 3 were hosting Epsom 3 in a Centenary Trophy (Surrey division 4) match. The match was drawn 3-3. Nick Grey and Ed Mospan (game) were the winners for Kingston, with Charlie Cooke and Greg Heath obtaining draws.
Our first team continued their impressive run in the second division of the 4NCL with two victories this weekend whilst our second team are feeling the heat
The Four Nations Chess League (4NCL) third weekend took place on 10/11 February 2024 over two locations. Our first team, CSC/Kingston 1, played at the Mercure in Telford, whereas the second and third teams played at the Delta Marriott Hotel in Warwick. Our top team won both their matches and now sit atop the second division. There are only two weekends to go and bookies have stopped taking bets on whether we will get promoted to the first division. Team manager Kate Cooke played down the prospect, wisely taking one weekend at a time, especially as we have yet to play our main competitors.
For those unfamiliar with 4NCL, it is for national chess teams conducted over four divisions. It is played to the highest international standards, with strict rules about mobile phones. Players are randomly scanned for electronic devices as they enter the playing hall. Players are not permitted to visit the bookstall nor their car, for which the penalty is a default. The time control is 40 moves in 100 minutes followed by 50 minutes for the rest of the game. For each move there is an increment of 30 seconds, which means that players must always write down their moves, even if there is less than 5 minutes left.
Saturday 10 February
The first team line-up was strengthened by the addition of IM Graeme Buckley on board 1. In Saturday’s key game against rivals The Sharks 2, Graeme had a convincing victory over IM Peter Roberson. The match was won 5.5-2.5.
Although CSC/Kingston 1 are riding high, a print of which should be framed, it should be noted that we have yet to play the teams in second, third and fourth places. Hence, the rigorous training sessions for the team conducted at our secret base in Surrey will be even more intensive.
Meanwhile, on Saturday over at Warwick, another recent recruit to the team, 15-year-old Luca Buanne, was top board for CSC/Kingston 2. The opponents were the hardy Hull and East Riding team, strengthened by some Ukrainian players. Luca made short work of his opponent in a sharp Pirc. The match was drawn 3-3.
Our third team played She Plays to Win, a training team for girls run by IM Lorin d’Costa. Although the girls were heavily outrated, they fought hard and drew the match. Nick Grey rued that he had lost to a 13-year-old, a common lament from the older generation.
Sunday 11 February
Our first team continued their winning ways beating the dangerous Anglian Avengers in the sixth round. The match was in the balance until going home time when Tom Farrand obtained a draw to secure victory. Plaudits to two first-team players who led the way with two wins each for the weekend: Peter Lalić and Clive Frostick. David Maycock launched a powerful attack against the Classical Caro-Kann.
Over at Warwick, our second team were facing the Wessex A team. The teams were evenly matched and the match score was level until the last game in which Wessex’s Allan Pleasants beat Julian Way with a tactical flourish.
CSC/Kingston 2 are now struggling not to be relegated from Division 3. We have lost three matches by the smallest of margins 3.5-2.5. There are still five rounds to go conducted over a weekend in March and a long weekend in May. Unfortunately in March both the first team and the second team are playing in Telford and we have found it difficult to get our best teams together for the cross-country trip. We face the dissonant prospect of having one team in the first division and two teams in the fourth division next season.
Meanwhile, our third team battled The Full Ponty, which included in-form Tony Hughes on board 5, winner of the recent All Saints Blitz. We were outrated by an average of 200 elo points per player. However the team played out of their socks with wins for Petr Vachtfeidl on board 1, the newcomer Fabio Buanne (father of Luca) on board 6 and, at well past going home time, Nick Grey on board 4. Nick’s position did not look convincing, but he played the endgame well and pulled a victory out of the hat against a player he first faced in 1979. The drawn match means that CSC/Kingston 3 remains mid-table with little prospect of promotion unless we do exceptionally well in the next two weekends.
Surrey League division 5 match played at the Peace Memorial Hall, Ashtead on 6 February 2024
Sometimes a defeat can feel almost as good as a victory, and this was one of those occasions. When Kingston captain Stephen Daines posted the opposing team on the club WhatsApp group, we feared the worst. Kingston’s fourth team were up against Ashtead 2 in the Minor Trophy (Surrey division 5) and we were outrated by an average of around 180 points a board. Most of our players have only been playing competitively since the end of the pandemic. Adrian Waldock, Ashtead’s experienced board 2, has been playing since around the end of the Paleozoic. One feared a whitewash.
In the end, though, it was a wonderfully close match, with Ashtead winning by just 3.5-2.5 – testament to how quickly our players are improving and the great spirit with which they compete. Captain Daines played what he called a “disastrous opening” with Black and quickly succumbed as his opponent Nick Thynne capitalised on his errors. But at least that gave him more time to enjoy his players’ performances.
Promising junior Jaden Mistry drew with Jack Buckley, rated 1580, on board 5, and at one point – with a passed pawn charging up the board – had winning chances. But they evaporated when Jaden decided to mop up his opponent’s pawns rather than support his own, and a draw was agreed with the position level.
Mark Sheridan lost against Daniel Richmond on board 3, making it 2.5-0.5 to Ashtead, but the remaining three boards were all very good news stories. Dieter McDougall outmanoeuvred Robert Jurjevic in a knight and pawn endgame, making his extra pawn tell to win a game that had looked more likely to end in a draw. Dieter has made a fine start to his Kingston career.
Just as impressive were the draws achieved by Sean Tay and Jimmy Kerr against Patrick O’Mara and Adrian Waldock on boards 1 and 2. Sean pressed but couldn’t quite convert what looked to be a small advantage, while Jimmy was under the cosh the entire game but managed to hold out and with time trouble looming a draw was agreed. The Waldock-Kerr game threw up one splendid position which must be shown:
Adrian chose to cash in here by playing 15. Nxh8 to win the exchange. That should indeed have been enough to win the game, but he misses a delightful win on the spot. Do you see it? 15. Nb5+! Black is forced to play 15…Kxd5 and 16. Nf4! is mate. Mated by two knights, with a bit of help from the queen, pinning the pawn on e5. Adrian missed it and chased the Black king all round the board for another 30 moves. He still had an advantage in the endgame – two rooks and six pawns to rook, bishop and five, but exhaustion may have been setting in and time was becoming a factor, so Adrian (always a pacific fellow) took a gentlemanly draw.
Full marks to Jimmy for fighting on in what at times seemed a hopeless position. As I said to him later, if he can survive that he can survive anything. It was a result of which he should be proud, as indeed should the entire team.
Lauder Trophy semi-final played at the Willoughby Arms on 5 February 2024
Just as we did in the first round when we squeaked past South Norwood, Kingston won this match against Coulsdon on board count. The final score was 3-3, but by virtue of winning the top two boards we took the match on tie-break by 12-9. In the event of a tie, top board is assigned a value of six, and the values then descend to board 6, which has a value of one (are you following this?). Winning boards 1, 2 and 6 gave Kingston a score of 12; winning boards 3, 4 and 5 gave Coulsdon a score of nine. It was that close and Coulsdon captain on the night Nick Edwards accepted his mathematical defeat with magnanimity.
Kingston suffered an early reverse when David Bickerstaff blundered and lost to Venerando Bermudez, a dangerous player, as he had demonstrated a couple of weeks earlier when he beat Jon Eckert in the Alexander Cup semi-final. Coulsdon had two super-solid players and a ratings advantage on boards 3 and 4, so it was always likely to be Kingston’s top two, Peters Lalić and Andrews, and new boy Ergo Nobel on board 6 who had to bring home the bacon, though Jon Eckert on 3 and Gregor Smith on 4 battled hard and were close to securing draws.
Peter Andrews, playing White against Nick Edwards on board 2, got an early advantage when Black chose to give up a pawn in this position in response to White’s provocative 9. d4, and after that Black’s game rapidly went downhill:
So 1-1 and one of the all-important top two boards in the bag. Ergo was doing very well on board 6, but Peter Lalić and Ian Calvert looked level on top board, while we had by no means given up all hope on boards 3 and 4. All to play for.
Ergo has been an excellent addition to the club this season, playing his first ever competitive rated chess and with a provisional rating of 1200 which probably does not represent his true strength – crucial in the Lauder where a team’s collective rating is not allowed to exceed 10,500: underrated players are gold-dust. Playing White, he had two pieces for a rook in his board 6 game against Mason Thorpe. He was also half an hour up on the clock and in the end that decided it: on the increment, Black played an illegal move, incurring a time penalty but also ensuring further material loss. He resigned, putting Kingston 2-1 up.
Gregor Smith, the exchange down but in what he felt was a holdable position, was having his own time problems against the always competitive Paul Jackson on board 4. Gregor blundered as time trouble approached, and Coulsdon were level. Jon Eckert, who had had a draw offer turned down, was still fighting valiantly on board 5 in a queen and pawn endgame, but Coulsdon’s Martin Faulkner was infiltrating with his queen and a loss was a danger, so realistically Peter Lalić had to conjure up one of his mysterious wins from a level position on board 1 to win the match. How would the sorcerer do it?
Board 1: Ian Calvert v Peter Lalić
Peter’s win put Kingston 3-2 up and we realised that even defeat on board 3 would mean us going through on board count. Jon Eckert fought to the end, but that was indeed the result, so by a hair’s breadth we are through to the final, where we will face last year’s winners Epsom, formidable opponents who have cracked the code of Lauder success. Can we construct another team capable of manufacturing a 3-3 “win”? All resignations in drawn positions will be gratefully accepted.
Stephen Moss, Kingston captain in the Lauder Trophy
Thames Valley division 1 match played at St Winefride’s Church Hall, Wimbledon on 1 February 2024
Wimbledon captain Ian Heppell said before the start of the match that this was the strongest Thames Valley League team they had turned out this season. They had IM Alberto Suarez Real on board 1, and, although Kingston had a rating advantage on the other five boards, they all looked likely to be tight.
One privilege enjoyed by Kingston members is Vladimir Li’s occasional series of lectures on positional chess, a key message from which is that positional and routine chess are very different things; even in quiet openings, players must be alert to tactical opportunities which can destroy the positional build-up. My game against Neil Cannon on board 5 illustrated this nicely. Black slightly mixed his plans by playing b6, which weakened his knight on c6, and then not following up immediately with Bb7. After nine moves, he was already lost.
With that quick goal in the net, Alan Scrimgour dodged a bullet against Tony Hughes (who was in form, having won the first Kingston Blitz at All Saints Church the previous day). After playing against Tony’s English much as he would as White against a Sicilian, Alan had launched a queenside foray with his queen and rook. For a moment, in the position below, White had the chance to win the exchange:
White could have played 17. Ndb1 and won the trapped rook for his knight. Fortunately – for Kingston at least – he missed the backward step (a common theme in my reports), Alan extricated himself, and a draw was soon agreed as simplification was about to occur.
Next to finish was Vladimir Li, who had White on top board against Suarez Real. After a King’s Indian Defence, Vladimir’s 16th move prompted an interesting debate later among the Kingston players:
Vladimir went with 16. Qb3. Black’s queen is his most active piece, defending several weak spots. Although after 16…Qxb3 17. axb3, the b-pawns are doubled, Black cannot get at them, and the semi-open a-file may be of use. Stockfish suggests 16. Qd2 as the best move – 16…Rac8 17. Be3 Qa5 18. Bf4 Qb6, but the evaluation (level) is the same. Vladimir was concerned that if the black queen was not challenged, Black could reorganise, moving his queen’s bishop to f5 and knight to d7 or e4 (though in such a line he would have to ensure that g4 would not win the bishop).
In the game, Vladimir got the sort of position the late world champion Tigran Petrosian would have loved, in which, although he had no immediate breakthrough himself, Black had no useful way to activate himself, and instead retreated his knight to e8 and bishop to f8 to hold the weak d6 point. Vladimir had a substantial time advantage as well, so the IM could not reasonably turn down a draw; clearly a good result for Kingston on the one board where we had a rating disadvantage.
Boards 2, 3 and 4 went the distance. On board 3, Silverio Abasolo had an early edge with White against Dan Rosen. In the position below, both sides must have missed that White had two ways to get a significant advantage:
The best move might be 15. Qe3, attacking the a-pawn. If 15…Kb8 16. e5 dxe5 17. Rxd8+ Qxd8 18. Qxe5+ wins, so White will win the d-pawn. If 15…b6, White can play a move which is the more daring option anyway: 16 Rxd6!, and after 16…Rxd6 17. e5 the fork wins back the rook, leaving White a pawn up.
After that, Black took the initiative. In this position, he perhaps “played for two results” by going for a slightly better ending rather than leaving the queens on:
30…Qf6 would have left White suffering: 31. Bg2 Rde8 32. Qd2 Nb6 threatens Nc4 and unbelievably the queen would be trapped in her own backyard, and White would have to give up the exchange. So 33. b3 is necessary, and White has multiple problems: the front rook is almost trapped, and Black threatens to land on f2, or pick off the weak white pawns. Instead he played 30… Qxe2. After 31. Bxe2 Rf2 32. h4 gxh4 33. Rh1 c5 34 Rd2 d4 35. Nd1 was a surprisingly effective defence. Pieces were exchanged, Silverio recovered his pawn, and in the final position (below) his passed pawn more than compensated for his less solid pawn structure and a draw was agreed.
For a long time, spectators found it difficult to evaluate Julian Way’s position against Ian Heppell on board 4. In the position that arose after 14…fxe6, which both sides had allowed voluntarily, were his doubled pawns sufficiently compensated by the two bishops, the extra open file and a central pawn mass?
Vladimir aptly described Peter Lalić’s game on board 2 against Russell Picot as “flowing like music”. Most of Peter’s games this season have started with him allowing an early queen exchange on d8 or d1. His opponents are attracted to preventing his king from castling, and probably by the thought that with queens off they improve their chances of a draw against a highly rated player. But this can be an illusion. Queenless middle games can require precision, and Peter has far more experience of handling such positions than most of his opponents will ever have. As in Julian’s game, there was an important point at which the two players allowed a sequence of moves which they must have evaluated differently.
A tremendous win by Peter to complete an excellent night for Kingston. It felt like a return to the “steamroller” first team of last year and propelled Kingston to the top of Thames Valley League division 1, though Hammersmith in second place have three matches in hand and must be warm favourites to win the title. Still, we were greatly encouraged by this performance, and enter the second half of the season in good heart.
Peter Andrews, Kingston 1 Surrey League captain and captain on the night in this match
Thames Valley division X match played at the Willoughby Arms, Kingston on 29 January 2024
Kingston C really deserved to win this match against Staines B, but were denied at the end in unfortunate circumstances when Sean Tay allowed the fact that his opponent had stopped recording under the five-minute rule to affect his play, in a game he was winning with some comfort up to that point.
Jaden Mistry got the match off to the best possible start with a quickfire victory against Martin Conlon on board 4. Martin’s Sicilian had given him a slight edge in the opening, but he omitted to castle and his position rapidly went downhill when White’s queen and rook launched an assault that led to mate.
Ergo Nobel blundered on board 1 to allow Ye Kyaw to equalise for Staines, but Colin Lyle played an excellent game on board 3 to go into a rook v knight endgame which, in the nature of such endgames, favoured the more mobile piece. 2-1 to Kingston and, with Sean well on top, victory in the match looked inevitable. But when his opponent stopped scoring (as he is allowed to) with just five minutes on the clock, the dynamic of the game changed and poor Sean blundered into a lost rook endgame. He tried hard to save it, but with his king offside it couldn’t be done.
So 2-2 at the end of a very good match, and lots of lessons learned. Most important: if you still have time and your opponent is playing on the increment, don’t try to blitz him. Play good moves that pose (hopefully insurmountable) problems. Don’t let your opponent’s time trouble affect your own play, and don’t worry about the fact that you are scoring and he isn’t. Just play your game. This was one that got away, but if that lesson is learned it will be positive in the end.
Thames Valley division 2 match played at St Luke’s Community Hall, Maidenhead on 29 January 2024
We made the long journey to Maidenhead with hope for revenge, after Maidenhead B emerged victorious at the Willoughby Arms back in December, our sole defeat of the season so far in this division. It was a familiar team construction for Kingston, with three 2000-rated players and three 1700-rated players, which always leads to an interesting dynamic where we appear favourites on the top boards and underdogs on the bottom ones.
Nick Grey on board 4 was first to finish. After declining Simon Foster’s Smith-Morra and transposing into a Alapin Sicilian, the game ended in a relatively quick draw with both sides seeking peace. A good start with the black pieces against a higher-rated opponent.
Also with the black pieces, Charlie Cooke on board 6 played a Petrov, ending up with quite a passive position. To get some activity, he sac’ed the exchange for a pawn and a well-placed knight, which gave him drawing chances, but he couldn’t hold on. First blood to Maidenhead.
On top board, Julian Way played the Four Knights against Stephen James. Julian reckons he perhaps came slightly worse out of the opening, but with neither player really confident of what was going on they settled for a draw.
In another declined Smith-Morra, I managed to launch a queenside attack with c and b pawns thrown down the board, well supported by an annoying “octopus” knight in the heart of my opponents defence on d6. The octopus played a key role, as I managed to sacrifice it for two pawns, paving the way for my now passed a and b pawns, which could not be stopped. This levelled the match at 2-2.
On board 3, Alan Scrimgour was weighing up whether to trade his queen for two rooks when he realised at the end of line he would pick up bishop as well. The extra material was too much as Alan expertly marshalled his bishop pair and rooks to checkmate Nigel Dennis, whose queen was left floundering at the other end of the board.
As so often, it was left to Peter Andrews playing out a blitz finish to determine the match. Peter found himself facing an unfamiliar double fianchetto opening by White. The game was tightly contested all the way through, but Peter gradually developed a slight edge by selecting the best files for his rooks while his opponent weakened his pawns slightly. As the clocks ran down, Peter took the initiative with a pseudo-pawn sacrifice, and emerged into a rook and minor piece ending a pawn up. With both players blitzing, there were a couple of transitory opportunities for him to win. Unfortunately he didn’o’t spot either of them, and was content to repeat moves for the draw which won the match.
Victory by 3.5-2.5. is an excellent result, which made the long journey worthwhile. Thanks as ever to Maidenhead for the hot drinks and excellent selection of biscuits.
Gregor Smith, Kingston B captain in Thames Valley League
Alexander Cup semi-final played at the Willoughby Arms, Kingston on 25 January 2024
Kingston, who have won the 10-board Alexander Cup – Surrey’s premier knockout competition – for the past two years and are bidding for a historic hat-trick have made it to the final, where they will face Wimbledon. But it was far from easy against a tough Coulsdon team, and with a quarter of an hour to go in the match a 5-5 tie and a decision by board count looked much more likely than the eventual 6-4 scoreline in favour of the home side.
Kingston were the stronger of the two teams in rating terms, but somehow it never felt like that. Indeed, there were long stretches of the evening where the play seemed to favour Coulsdon, who were an intriguing mix of talented juniors and canny veterans. Does no one aged between 20 and 70 play chess in south London?
The first games to finish were on boards 8, where Peter Andrews with White drew with Matt Darville, and 7, where Julian Way with Black drew with Olufemi George. Peter’s game, an English that turned into a kind of Amsterdam Attack, was short but very interesting, with the two players attacking on opposite sides of the board. It could have produced a dramatic and violent game, but with so much at stake they opted for peace in the position below, where White has a small edge but is anxious about his ragged pawn structure.
“At the end,” said Peter later, “I was worried about my e-pawn, thinking I would have to play Bc1 and Bd2 before castling. And I was worried about my h-pawn. I didn’t like e4 because of the hole on d4. But 19. e4 Nd4 20. Nxd4 exd4 21. Nd5 is good for White. I thought I was worse, and that he was offering a draw because of my rating and the situation on the clock. I was more than 20 minutes behind, having felt that I was under pressure when in fact I was never worse and was repeatedly missing chances to play d4 and be significantly better – a lesson I shall take away when playing this sort of position both as White and as Black.”
Julian Way’s opponent chose a sharp e4 opening and was looking to get on the front foot for most of their game, but Julian defended with characteristic skill and White was soon out of attacking ideas, pieces were liquidated and a draw was inevitable in this completely level position:
John Foley’s game on board 9 against Paul Jackson, who had beaten him in a recent league match at Coulsdon, also ended in a draw shortly afterwards. John, with Black, had gone a pawn down and in the position in which a draw was agreed (see below) White has a small edge, but he may have felt that Black’s bishop – faced with an array of tempting White squares – had more long-term potential than his own somewhat inhibited knight.
The first decisive blow was struck on board 10, and it was a moment of near despair for Kingston. Jon Eckert was playing confidently with White against Venerando Bermudez, who is modestly rated but clearly highly regarded by Coulsdon.
Jon had built up an excellent attacking position and the talk in the bar downstairs was of a guaranteed point for Kingston. This position was reached after White’s 35th move:
The next game to finish was Will Taylor’s, and the denouement was sudden owing to an unfortunate blunder by his opponent Nick Edwards, who had been playing very imaginatively with Black to this point. In this position Black has a slight edge, but disaster is lurking just around the corner.
Matches in amateur chess – perhaps much professional chess too – always hinge on blunders, but this sudden collapse levelled the scores and lifted the Kingston spirits. As Will Taylor said after the match: “If my opponent hadn’t blundered into a queen trap then anything could have happened, but I got away with it.” Will’s win was absolutely critical, and I couldn’t resist giving him a bear hug. Hope was reviving.
David Maycock looked to be in trouble on board 1 – a piece down with some degree of compensation in terms of his opponent’s tangled pieces, but surely not enough to offset the material deficit. But Peter Lalić and Vladimir Li were doing well, Silverio Abasolo’s game looked drawish, and Kingston debutant Luca Buanne on board 5 also looked solid, though his opponent had a substantial time advantage.
The results in the final five games – on boards 1 to 5 significantly – came thick and fast as we reached the last 20 minutes of the three-hour playing session. There is some dispute over who finished next, but I am going to plump for Peter, who appeared in the bar downstairs to celebrate his crucial victory with Black on board 4 against the youthful Timur Kuzhelev, a player he had done battle with in recent congresses. Peter is always so reliable in these vital cup games, and time pressure seems to bring out the best in him.
John Saunders, the distinguished chess journalist and commentator, who was kindly attending the match to take photographs, declared this the game of the match.
Peter Andrews summed up Peter’s performance in this game well afterwards. “Rxe5 was an unbelievable move to find over the board in a time scramble,” he said. “I was watching live at that point and my head hurt. What a pity Peter didn’t find 30. Be5, leaving the queen and rook where they can be captured unprotected and putting the bishop en prise as well. There would have been metaphorical gold coins on the board for that one.”
On board 5, Luca Buanne with Black was engaged in a tough struggle with Nasir Rizvi, who played the English (a favourite among Coulsdon players). Luca played the opening well and emerged with a small plus. Nasir temporarily gave up a pawn for rook activity, but soon got it back and had a slight advantage as time trouble loomed. There followed one of those rook endgames where, if you get an opportunity, it has to be taken and Nasir’s came in the position below:
The game on board 2 between Vladimir Li and the prodigy Supratit Banerjee was also drawn, but it was incident-packed. This was the position after Black’s 16th move:
As the game proceeded, Vladimir seemed to be getting the upper hand, and we had high hopes of netting the full point. But things soon went awry.
We calculated that if David lost on board 1 and Silverio drew on board 3, we would still win 12-11 on board count. Silverio kept his part of the bargain, drawing against the talented junior Balahari Bharat Kumar after a protracted, highly technical and very high-class struggle.
Balahari looked ready to repeat moves at one stage, but Silverio chose to keep the game going by playing 21…c4 in the position below to force an exchange of queens. Black had an edge for much of the game, but in the end Balahari was able to draw without undue alarm.
We believed we had won the match on board count, but David Maycock – aka “the Magician” – put it beyond all doubt by conjuring up a win against Mark Gray on board 1. This was the tactical sequence which had panicked the Kingston bar-flies in the early part of the game:
There were differing views among the spectators as to whether David had any compensation for the lost piece. Objectively, he probably doesn’t, but what a tangled web he weaves, especially with Mark’s rook and queen marooned away from the action. White’s decisive error came in this position:
A remarkable end to a remarkable night. Kingston had won 6-4; Coulsdon had played with great skill and determination; and the match – overseen by Kingston captain Ljubica Lazarevic, who is a qualified arbiter – was played in tremendous spirit. Coulsdon, with their posse of talented juniors, are rising fast, and we urgently needed this win because it won’t get any easier in the future. Now for Wimbledon in the final and the chance of a hat-trick of Alexander Cup wins for the first time in the club’s 150-year history.