Kingston B v Maidenhead B, Thames Valley division 2 match played at the Willoughby Arms, Kingston on 4 November 2024
This was the board 6 game in the match between Kingston B and Maidenhead B in Thames Valley division 2. In many way, it was the pivotal game in the match. We were 2-1 down when it was reaching its conclusion, and Alicia’s opponent appeared to have reasonable drawing chances. But under time pressure she played superbly to convert the small advantage she had nursed for most of the game, drawing admiration from Peter Andrews, whose own board 3 game had just finished and who was watching intently as Alicia’s queen-and-knight mating net closed on her opponent. Her win tied the match at 2-2, and a win and a draw by Peter Hasson and David Rowson on boards 1 and 2 then saw us over the line for a 3.5-2.5 victory. A blessed relief after being 2-0 down earlier in the evening.
Alicia Mason
Yury Krylov
KIngston B v Maidenhead B
November 4, 2024 – Willoughby Arms, Kingston
Annotated by Alicia Mason
1.e4c62.d4d53.Nc3dxe44.Nxe4Bf55.Ng3Bg66.h4h5?! I thought h5 was a bit strange. h6 is more usual. This is the main line of the Caro:6…h67.h5Bh78.Nf3e69.Bd3Bxd310.Qxd3Nf611.Ne4Nbd712.Bd2Nxe413.Qxe4Qb614.O-O-OQa6with a level position.7.Nf3Nd78.Bd3Bxd39.Qxd3Ngf610.Bd2?! Maybe this is a bit timid and something like Bg5 or Ng5 would be better, though I wasn’t sure if there would be much point to it before Black plays …e6. I hadn’t yet decided whether to castle kingside or queenside here.10.Ng5g611.Qb3e612.Qxb7c513.N3e4Nxe414.Qxe4Bg715.dxc5O-O16.O-ONxc517.Qe2Qd518.Rd1Qc619.Be3with a slight advantage for White10…e611.O-OI thought for a long time here before eventually deciding on castling kingside. I expected Black to play …c5 now that the d5 square is covered, and I didn’t fancy having my king on the c-file after an exchange on d4 or c5.11…Be7?!I wonder if he should have played …c5 here to challenge my centre immediately. The computer likes …Bd6. Either way, this looks a bit passive.12.Rfe1Rc8Already there are tempting ideas of sacrificing on e6 here, when if Black takes, Qg6+ and Ng5 will land him in big trouble. I worried about the move Nc5, but the engine likes the sac.13.c4?!13.Rxe6fxe613…Nc514.Rxe7+Qxe715.dxc5O-Owith a winning advantage for White13…O-OBlack’s best defence14.Re2Bd615.Nf5Qc716.Qb3Rce817.Rxe8Rxe818.Nxd6Qxd619.Qxb7Rb820.Qxa7Rxb221.c4Nf8when White stands better14.Qg6+Kf815.Ng5Qe816.Nxe6+Kg817.Qxg7#13…O-O14.Ng5Threatening Nxh5, as the knight on f6 must guard against mate on h7.14…g615.b4?! Now I calculated Rxe6, when again, if Black takes, he’s in big trouble. But Nc5 saves him, and this time, it’s a lot more effective because my d-pawn is pinned. I’m proud of myself for making a point of checking for my opponent’s resources before going for this line. So I chose to play b4 instead, which covers the c5 square and makes Rxe6 a real threat. It also hinders Black’s ideas of playing c5 as well. As it turns out, though, I actually could have played Nxe6!15.Rxe6Nc515.Nxe6Nc516.Nxd8Nxd317.Rxe7Rfxd818.Rxb7Ne819.Ne2a6and White is well on top15…Nh7My opponent parries the threat, though the engine still favours Nxe6.16.N3e416.Nxe6fxe617.Qxg6+Kh818.Rxe6Rf619.Rxf6Bxf620.Nxh5Qg821.Qxg8+Rxg822.Nxf6Nhxf616…Ndf6Black wants to swap off pieces to lessen the attack.17.Nxh717.Nc5is a better way to play17…Bxc5This knight really has to be taken, or it’s carnage on e6.18.bxc5b619.Qc3bxc519…Nd720.Rad1Nxg521.Bxg5Qc722.cxb6axb6and White has the edge20.dxc5Re821.Bf4Re722.Nxh7Nxh723.Bh6e524.Rad1Qe825.Rd6Nf826.Bg5Re617…Nxh717…Kxh718.Ng5+Kh8may be OK18…Kg8would lose to19.Rxe6Kg8 would lose to Rxe6, in the same line that we saw earlier, because Qxg6 would come with check19…fxe620.Qxg6+Kh821.Nxe618.g3I feel like the pawn on h4 is important for restraining Black’s minor pieces and keeping hold of the dark squares, so I wanted to protect it here. We have near-symmetrical pawn formations on the kingside, but the difference is that my bishop can take advantage of his weak dark squares, while it’s much harder for him to get at my light squares because I’ve pushed him back.18…Re819.Bc3Aiming at the kingside dark squares.19…Bf820.Rad1Bg721.Qf3Trying to line up my rook against Black’s queen, and potentially also taking aim at the pawn on f7 eventually.21…Qc722.c5I’d been waiting to play this move. It looks a bit double-edged, because my d-pawn is now backward and weak, but I wanted to try and get my knight to d6, potentially to get him to exchange his bishop for the knight, when I’d be left with a monopoly over the dark squares. Now that he can no longer play Qd5, I thought that this was the right moment.22…Re7Black decides to keep his bishop on g7.23.Nd6Rf824.d5I decided to sac a pawn here to try and open lines for my pieces and keep the knight on h7 out of play. Of course, the engine doesn’t like it.24.Bd2would have been another way of sacrificing the pawn, without giving Black a protected passed pawn!24…Bxd425.Bh6Bg726.Bxg7Kxg727.Qc3+Kg828.a4and White is better24…Bxc325.Qxc3cxd5For some reason I’d only really looked at25…exd5here when I would have exchanged on e7 and taken the e-file with Re1. My opponent obviously wanted to avoid opening up lines.26.Rxe7Qxe727.Re1I certainly have compensation for the pawn here, as Black’s knight is out of the game, I have the e-file and the dark squares, and a beautiful knight on d6. Now my plan would be Qe5-e7, exchanging queens and getting my rook onto the seventh rank, and going after his queenside pawns while his pieces would still be very passive.26.Qe5Setting up a threat, which my opponent misses.26…a6? Not too sure what I would have played after26…Rd727.Rd3b628.Rc3a529.a3axb430.axb4bxc531.bxc5Qd832.Rf3Rc733.Rc1when the position is level, though Black has to be careful33…Rc634.Rxf7!34…Rxf735.Qh8+!!35…Kxh836.Nxf7+Kg837.Nxd8Rc838.Nxe627.Rxd5I regain the pawn and have a much better position.27…Rd728.Rd3Rfd829.Red1There are some lovely tactics in the air here. One idea is to retreat the queen to c3 and then play Ne8, threatening the queen and mate on g7. Black would have to take the knight, when I could win the exchange and crash through with Rxd7.29…Nf8This defends d7, so the Ne8 idea would no longer work.30.Qe3?! Hinting at getting in on h6, and possibly bringing the knight around to f6 via e4.30.Nxf7! would have worked here. I saw Nxf7 ideas during the game, but didn’t see far enough to make them work.30…Qxe530…Rxf731.Qxc7Rxc732.Rxd831.Nxe5Rxd332.Rxd3Rxd333.Nxd330…Qc6The engine prefers31.Ne431.Qe5f532.a3b633.cxb6Qxb634.Ne8Kf735.Rxd7+Rxd736.Rxd7+Nxd737.Nd6+Ke738.Nc8+Kf739.Qc3Qb840.Qc6Nf6But that’s probably beyond human calculation. Mine anyway.31…Nh7Black covers the Nf6 square.31…Rxd3Black should seize the chance to exchange rooks, rather than remaining passive32.Rxd3Rxd333.Qxd3e534.Qe2b635.cxb6Qxb636.Qc4Ne6when White has only a small advantage32.Rxd7I decided to exchange the rooks, since my queen can’t really do much while it’s tied down defending d3.32…Rxd733.Rxd733.Rd6would have been a nice way to do it, giving myself a strong passed d-pawn.33…Rxd634.cxd6e535.Qc5Qxc536.Nxc5Kf837.Nxb7Nf638.Kf1Ke839.Nc5Nd540.a3Nc341.a4f542.a5Nb543.Nxa6Kd744.Nc5+Kxd633…Qxd734.Nd634.Qh6was tempting to try for the royal fork with Qxh7 and Nf6+, but could have frittered away my advantage.34…Qd1+35.Kh2Qd536.Qxh7+Kxh737.Nf6+Kg738.Nxd5exd534…Nf635.Qf3Nd5The only sensible move for Black.36.a3Securing my queenside pawns.36…b637.Qd3bxc538.bxc5OK I have a passed pawn now, though it’ll be some time before it can go anywhere.38…a5I thought for a little while here before taking the plunge with Qa6. I was wary about allowing Black counterplay with …Qa4. I also considered Qb5, but I was worried about losing my c-pawn after the exchange of queens. I was down to my last three minutes here.39.Qa6a4Here, I was very surprised that Black didn’t play Qa4. Maybe he wanted to keep his queen nearer the king and the c-pawn to defend.40.Qa8+Kh7This has to be a blunder as f7 is caving in now.40…Kg741.Ne8+Kh641…Kh7I saw this absolutely mad line during the game42.Qxd5!!42…Qxd542…Qxe843.Qb7Qf844.c6Qxa345.Qxf7+Kh846.c7Qc1+47.Kh2a348.Qe8+Kg749.Qd7+Kf650.c8=QQxc851.Qxc843.Nf6+Kg744.Nxd5exd545.c642.c6Qe741.Qf8f5Forced mate.41…Qe7would have held on longer, though it’s still winning for White42.Nf7!42…g543.Qh8+Kg644.Ne5#Short of time, I didn’t even realise this move was mate until I played it – I just wanted to win his queen! I was very happy at the end of this game, even though there were many points where I could have played better. I resisted the temptation to go for an unsound rook sacrifice on move 15 (even if I missed a couple of sacrifices that actually were viable, as well as a couple of other tactics), and I liked the idea behind my move 24. d5 as well, keeping Black passive (even if Bd2 would have been a better execution of that idea). Takeaways: calculate sacrifices carefully to make sure which ones work and which ones don’t. Maybe spend a bit less time in the opening, so I have more time later to calculate said sacrifices.1–0
Kingston C v Maidenhead D, Thames Valley League division X match played at the Willoughby Arms, Kingston on 4 November 2024
Maidenhead sent two teams to Kingston on Monday 4 November – their B and D sides – which is no mean feat considering the distance and logistics. They would have managed to get all 10 players over to us, too, but for a late dropout from the B team, which left them one short and meant their D team top board had to move up to the Bs. That default was important in ensuring a Kingston victory in a four-board match.
We had juniors Jaden Mistry and William Lin on boards 1 and 2, and both played forceful games to win against decent opponents. Rob Taylor lost on board 3 and looked at bit disconsolate – “take the positives”, as they say, Rob, the wheel will turn – and Colin Lyle won by default on board 4 to complete a welcome 3-1 TVX victory. Kingston have half a dozen promising juniors, and they are very important to the future of the club.
Surbiton B v Kingston B, Thames Valley League division 2 match played at Fircroft, Surbiton on 30 October 2024
This was a very satisfying evening. We had set out with a clear strategy in this match: to win with White and draw with Black, and that is exactly what we did across all six boards, giving Kingston an emphatic 4.5-1.5 victory against our neighbours and kicking off our Thames Valley division 2 campaign in style.
The first game to finish was on board 4, where Alan Scrimgour – with Black – and Andrew Boughen agreed a draw after 13 moves in the position below. Black has certainly equalised and may even have a small plus, but given the team strategy this was a perfectly satisfactory start.
Board 6, between Surbiton legend Paul Durrant (how good to see him back playing competitive chess) and Jon Eckert, also ended in a draw. Paul was a pawn to the good, but Jon had an initiative which Paul considered sufficient compensation, and peace was declared in the position below.
The critical board 2 game between Will Taylor, with Black, and Joshua Pirgon was also drawn after a dry, technical struggle in the Petrov Defence. We had identified Josh as a dangerous young player likely to turn out for Surbiton on board 2 or 3, and Will was the perfect opponent to steer him away from the sort of tactical melee in which he excels. The final position, with White to play, is stone-cold level.
Half the mission had been accomplished. Now could the Kingston players with the White pieces keep their side of the bargain? Peter Andrews, up against old adversary and Surbiton captain Nick Faulks on board 3, certainly could. He had the upper hand from an early stage and we were confident he would convert, which he did after a couple of hours’ play.
12…Ne6“This is basically the losing move,” explains Peter. “12…exf4 is just a slight edge for white. Black has ambitions against the pawns on f4 and e2, but White can control the threats.”12…exf413.Nxc513.g4Bf714.Nxc5Bxc515.Rxc5O-O16.O-ONe613…Bxc514.Rxc5f315.exf3O-O16.O-O16.Rxh5Qe8+16…Bf713.f5Ned414.g4Bf715.e3Nb516.Nxc5“And White has a winning advantage. He is a pawn up, the knight on b5 is misplaced, c6 and b7 are under pressure, and White has the potential for a kingside attack.”16…Bd517.O-O“Stockfish recommends 17 Nxb7. I was worried about retrieving the knight, but if eg 17 … Qd7 18. Bxd5 Qxd5 19. Qe2 I had of course forgotten that my knight on f2 was defending the rook on h1 so I have time for this, and although the game goes on, White has two extra pawns and should win. I was unruffled by the bishop exchange, having seen that my knight gets in on e6.”17.Nxb7Qd718.Bxd5Qxd519.Qe2Rb819…a620.Qc4Qxc421.Rxc4Nb422.a3Nd523.a4Na724.Ke2Rb825.Nc5Bxc526.Rxc5Rxb327.Bxe5Ne728.Rc7Nac829.Rhc1Kf730.Bd420.e4Ncd421.exd5Nxe222.Kxe2Rxb723.Rc8+Bd824.Ne4Kd725.Rc617…Bxg218.Kxg2Qb619.Ne6Kf720.Ne4“g5 can be played immediately, but there was a lot to calculate. This slower line allows Black his last chance to defend with h6, although White is still well on top.”20.g5g620…Nd621.Qf3Rag822.Kh1Qa523.Bc3Qb624.Ng4Qb525.e4Rc826.Nh6+gxh627.Qh5+Kg828.gxf621.gxf6Bxf622.Ne4gxf523.Qh5+Kxe624.Qxf5+Ke725.Qxf6+Kd726.Nc5+20…Rac820…h621.g5Rhe822.gxf6Bxf6“Obviously if gxf6 23 Qh5+ wins quickly. 23. Qh5+ Kg8 24. Qg4+ and mate on g7.”22…gxf623.Qh5+Kg824.Qg4+Kf725.Qg7#23.a4“This felt a bit sadistic. Part of the idea is that if the knight retreats I will have Nd6+, forking the king and both rooks, but I also had in mind that once the knight moves my queen’s bishop can join the attack via a3, eg 23…. Nc7 24. Qh5+ Ke7 25. Ba3+ Kd7 26. Qf7+ Ne7 27. N4c5+ Kc6 28. Na6+ Kd7 Naxc7.”23…Ne723…Nc724.Qh5+Kg824…Ke725.Ba3+Kd726.Qf7+Ne727.N4c5+Kc628.Na6+Kd729.Naxc725.Nxf6+gxf626.Qg4+Kf727.Qg7#24.Rxc8Rxc825.Qh5+Kg826.axb5“And with White already a piece up and with the threat of 27. Nxf6+ gxf6 28. Qg4+ in the air, Black resigned.”1–0
Kingston were now 2.5-1.5 up and we were feeling comfortable. Board 5 was looking good for us, and board 1 perhaps drawish. On board 5, Stephen Lovell was making one of his rare appearances for Kingston. It is always very welcome when he does have time to turn out, because he is a strong player whose rating would most likely be 2000-plus if he played regularly. Here he played an excellent game against the very experienced Graham Alcock. Things were level until Graham made a slip in opening up the position on his 26th move.
26…cxb4? The engine recommends26…a527.bxa5bxa528.Qc3Bxa429.Ra1Bd730.Rxa5Ra831.Rca1Rxa532.Rxa5Rb833.Ra7Nf834.Ng1g5Completely level.27.Qxb4Rxc128.Rxc1Rc829.Rxc8Bxc830.Qc4Qb731.d4Nf832.dxe5fxe533.fxe5dxe5Suddenly White, with a passed pawn and a target on e5, is winning.34.Qc3Qb835.h4Bd736.Qb4Qc737.Qe7+Kg838.Ng1Qc339.Nf3Bxa4?The situation is already grim for Black, but this desperate bid to make a queenside pawn run just compounds matters.40.Ng5Qc841.Qxe5Bd742.Qf6b543.e5b444.e6Be845.d6Qc346.Qe7Qd247.Qxe8Qxd648.Qf7+Black resigns with mate after 49. e7 imminent.1–0
That was the match done and dusted, and David Rowson on board 1 then made it the perfect evening by winning against Liam Bayly – these two are also old adversaries – as Liam’s clock started to run down.
25…e5“A natural move,” says David, “but it gives Black some problems as my pieces are quite well placed and his are a bit awkward, especially the ones on d7 and e7, though I had no idea about this at the time.”26.dxe5Nxe527.Nxe5Bxe528.Nf3Bg729.Rc1Qb730.Bg530.Qa3followed by Qd6 was actually better than what I played, says David. Stockfish recommends30…Be6though it looks strange.30…Bf6?Losing. Black should reposition the knight.30…Ng831.Rb1Qa832.Qd2Nf633.Ne5Be634.Bh6Qa735.Bxg7+Kxg736.Re1Qb6Ugly moves to have to make and White is on top and pressing, but Black is still in the game.31.Bxf6+Rxf632.Qa1“I was pleased to find 32. Qa1,” says David, “as it’s perhaps not so easy to think of moving the queen back there.32…Qa633.Qd4“As Julian Way, who was spectating, pointed out after the game, I could have just exchanged queens here and played everything a move earlier, but I didn’t see it then. Fortunately I was still winning. At the end Black must lose a piece – the d7 and e7 line-up eventually proves the problem.”33.Qxa6Rxa634.Rc7Kg834…Rd635.Ne5Be636.Rxe7d437.Be4Kg838.f4Bd539.Bd3Rb640.Rd7Bb335.Rxd7Kf833…Qb634.Qxb6Rxb635.Rc7Rd636.Ne5Black resigns. He is about to lose a piece and the d-pawn is doomed36.Ne5Be637.Rxe7Bg838.Bf1g539.Bd3Re640.Nf7+Bxf741.Rxf7h642.Rd7Kg843.Rxd5Kg744.Kg2Rf645.Bf51–0
Hounslow C v Kingston C, Thames Valley League division X match played at the Royal British Legion, Hounslow on 28 October 2024
I intend to pass very quickly over this match. We lost 4-0 to a much higher-rated Hounslow team, and you may think anything I say constitutes sour grapes, but in fact the match was played in what we considered unsatisfactory conditions – a noisy bar area which was certainly not an appropriate environment for rated chess.
Kingston captain Jon Eckert decided to proceed with the match – in conditions really only suitable for friendly, beer-fuelled blitz – on the grounds that his players had made the long journey over to Hounslow and were there to play chess. But the Kingston club has made representations to the league about the conditions in which the match was played, and will be seeking assurances that they will not be repeated against a visiting Kingston team.
Wallington 1 v Kingston 3, Surrey League division 4 match played at Wallington on 23 October 2024
We always knew this would be tough. Kingston 3 were up against Wallington’s first team, and they had strong players (including a certain Mr P Lalić) on boards 1 to 3. That we ran them so close is testimony to the fighting spirit of the team and bodes well for future battles in Surrey division 4.
David Bickerstaff and Kingston captain Ed Mospan had good wins against lower-rated opposition on boards 4 and 5; Jon Eckert had an excellent draw with Black against the strong Wallington (and indeed Coulsdon) veteran Nick Edwards on board 2; while on board 4 Ye Kwaw miscalculated in a Closed Sicilian and paid the price against Robert Davies.
The board 3 match-up between Alicia Mason and David Jones was a tough battle that was resolved in Jones’s favour after just shy of 60 moves. Alicia played aggressively and was ahead for much of the game, but she made some errors in the endgame – time trouble was inevitably a factor – and let her advantage slip.
Despite that, she had good drawing chances until a misjudgement on her 52nd move. The position below looks tricky for White, with the Black king about to snaffle the white pawns, but with best play it is drawn. As it was, there was no way back from the move which Alicia chose. Such is the precision required in endgames, where every tempo is a matter of life and death.
52.Bc6?? This is the losing mistake. White must activate the king.52.Kf4Kd452…Kb253.Ke5Kxa254.Kd6Na655.c5a456.bxa4b357.Kc6b258.Be4Nb4+59.Kb7Kb360.c6Nxc661.Kxc6Kxa462.Kc5Kb363.Bb1Kc364.Kb5Kb365.Be4Ka366.Ka5Ka267.Kb4b1=N68.Bxb1+Kxb153.Kf3a454.bxa4Nxa455.c5Kxc556.Bh3Nc357.Be6Kb558.Ke3Ka559.Bc4Ka460.Kd4Ka561.Be6Kb562.Bd5Ka463.Kc5Nxd564.Kxd5Kb565.Kd6Kc466.Kc6Kd467.Kb5Kc368.Kc5b369.axb3Kxb352…Kb253.Kf3Kxa254.Ba4Nxa455.bxa4b356.c5b257.c6b1=Q58.c7Qc20–1
Board 1 was a battle of the Kingston Peters – Peter Lalić (moonlighting for Wallington) and Peter Roche, a former Kingston chair now happily restored to competitive action after a five-year break. Facing the mighty Lalić is always a challenge, but Peter R gave him a good run for his money in a well-contested game.
Roche, Peter J1936
Lalic, Peter D2252
Centenary Trophy, Surrey League
October 23, 2024 – Wallington United Reformed Church
Annotated by Stephen Moss
1.d4d52.Bg5The Levitsky Attack. Peter R is a dynamic player, always looking to grab the initiative, but this bishop can become a target.2…Nc63.e3Bf54.Bd3Qd75.a3Unnecessary prophylaxis. Better to develop.5.Nc3Nb46.Nf3Nxd3+7.cxd3Instinctively. we might shy away from such a set-up, but the engine thinks White has a small edge here.7…f68.e4Bg49.Bf4e610.Qb3c65…e5Black gets this important move in and is now on the front foot.6.Be2f67.Bh4O-O-O8.Nc3h59.h3White is being squeezed for space and Black is dictating terms.9…Qf710.Bd3e411.Bb5Qg612.Kf1Nge713.Nge2Qf714.Bg3h4The dark-squared bishop has indeed become a target, but White is hanging on. Black should follow up with g5 and the failure to do so, preferring instead to switch his attention to the queenside, gives White time to regroup and try to reclaim the initiative.15.Bh2a616.Ba4Na517.b4White now gets traction on the queenside and is fighting back well.17…Nc418.Bb3g5At last.19.Bxc4White decides the annoying knight on c4 must be unhorsed, but the engine suggests b5 first instead in an attempt to weaken Black’s queenside defences.19.b5Qe620.Bxc4dxc421.Qd2Rh722.Rb1Bg623.bxa6Qxa619…dxc4Black is close to equality, but b5 should be played immediately rather than prepared for.20.Qb120.b5g421.bxa6bxa622.Nf4gxh323.gxh3Bh624.Qe2Bxf425.Bxf4Qe626.Ke1Bxh327.Rxh3!27…Qxh328.Qxc4Kd7What a game this would have been!20…b621.a4Kb722.Ke1Nc823.g4Bg624.d5This advance loosens White’s position unnecessarily. The pawn on d5 is an immediate target.24…Ne725.Qa2? Compounding the error. The engine suggests25.d6cxd626.Qd1f527.a5Bg728.axb6Rhf829.b5fxg430.bxa6+Kc631.Nd4+Bxd432.Qxd4Qxf2+33.Kd1g334.Kc1d535.Ra5gxh2A crazy position. Maybe only computers and super-GMs can think like this. White would now be winning.25…Nxd526.Qxc4Nxe3An excellent, and indeed winning, move, but Peter L misses something even stronger.26…Bxb427.Rb1Nxc328.Qxb4Nxb129.Qxb1f530.Nd4fxg431.hxg4Rxd432.exd4Qf333.Kd2e3+34.Kc334.fxe3Qf2+35.Kc3Qxe3+36.Kb2Qxd4+34…Qc6+35.Kb3Rf836.f4gxf437.Qc1f327.Qxf7Nxc2+28.Kf1Bxf729.Rc1Bb3Two pawns up and with two marauding bishops, Black is well on top and the battle of the Peters is effectively over, though there will be some necessary mopping up.30.Nxe4Bxb431.Kg2Bxa432.f3c533.Kf2Rhf834.Rhd1Rxd135.Rxd1Nd436.Nxd4Bxd137.Ne6Rh838.Nxf6a539.Ne4a440.Be5Ra841.Nc7Rd842.Nb5Rd343.Nxg5Bd244.f4a345.Ne4Be3+46.Kf1a247.Nbd6+Kc648.Nc4Bd449.Bxd4Rxd40–1
Congratulations to Kingston member Ameet Ghasi on his tremendous achievement in gaining the grandmaster title at the age of 37
Earlier this week came the heartening news that IM Ameet Ghasi had secured (subject to Fide ratification) the third and final norm he needed to be awarded the grandmaster title. He got the all-important final norm at a very strong tournament in Fagernes, Norway, where he came joint third with 6.5/9 and recorded a tournament performance of 2609.
It will have pleased Ameet that his good friend, 21-year-old IM Jonah Willow, with whom he has recently trained, secured his first GM norm with 7/9 and a tournament performance of 2630, which gained him joint first place alongside Kazakh grandmaster Rinat Jumabayev, a two-time champion of Kazakhstan and a player with a peak rating above 2650.
Ameet is England’s 42nd GM and the oldest to win the title in active competition (Jonathan Penrose was awarded the title retrospectively in 1993 at the age of 60). It marks a neat double this year, as in August 15-year-old Shreyas Royal became the UK’s youngest ever GM.
The oldest and youngest English GM title winners: Ameet Ghasi and Shreyas Royal at Hastings last Christmas
Ameet would have achieved the GM title decades ago were it not for the fact that he prioritised getting a degree and working full time as an accountant. What is remarkable about his achievement is that he has made it to GM as an amateur player and after taking an eight-year break from the game. His great natural talent was underlined when in 2000, at the age of just 13, he shared first prize in the British Rapidplay Chess Championships. In 2015 he again shared the title, this time with Mark Hebden, and in 2023 he won it outright.
Chess journalist John Saunders dug out his British Chess Magazine report on the 13-year-old Ameet’s remarkable performance back in 2000: “About 400 players took part in the British Rapidplay Championships at Leeds Metropolitan University over the weekend of 18/19 November. There were five grandmasters among the 47 entrants in the Open, which had been won by Michael Adams in 1999. There was a two-way tie for first place between Aaron Summerscale and 13-year-old Ameet Ghasi. This was a sensational performance by the youngster from Birmingham, who plays for Slough second team in the 4NCL. After a steady start, during which he drew with experienced IMs Ferguson, Turner and Williams, he reeled off four successive wins in the final rounds, including the scalps of grandmasters Arkell and Hebden.”
Saunders was delighted by confirmation 24 years later of the Birmingham schoolboy’s prodigious talent. “I’ve been following Ameet’s progress avidly via the [English Chess] Forum these past few days. It was on the 65 bus from Richmond to home, browsing the Forum on my smartphone, that I first read that Ameet had achieved his title. I surprised myself (and my wife Elaine rather more) when I punched the air with pleasure on reading the news. Yesterday I sent Ameet a congratulatory message, mentioning his remarkable feat in defeating Hebden and Arkell on the same day aged 13. That should have counted as a GM norm in itself!”
Ameet in league action for Kingston against IM Peter Large, then at Epsom but now happily a Kingston player
Kingston club president John Foley also expressed his delight at the news in the October Kingston Chess Club Bulletin, publication of which fortuitously occurred on the very day Ameet secured the title. “This is a remarkable achievement for an amateur player who, in the real world, is an internal auditor for an American pharmaceutical company, which leaves him little time to devote to chess,” he wrote. ” It is a tribute to Ameet’s grit and determination that he carried this personal project though to a successful conclusion.”
“It’s been a long time coming,” said Ameet. “It’s like a huge milestone, and one that was challenging enough for me. But I can’t say I’ve been celebrating. It’s more just a relief, to be honest. I’ve been given a tag for many years, since I won the British Rapid event at the age of 13, of being a rapid and blitz specialist who should be a GM. Covid didn’t help, and I’ve always been basically working full time. I also took a long break from chess, so there were reasons for the delay. It’s been frustrating, but It’s good that it’s done now. That’s the main thing.”
Stephen Moss, Kingston club captain
* Thanks to John Saunders, former editor of both British Chess Magazine and Chess, for allowing us to use his photographs of Ameet playing Shreyas Royal at the 2023/24 Hastings Congress and in action for Kingston against Epsom. John also kindly allowed us to quote his BCM report on the British Rapidplay Chess Championships in 2000 at which Ameet first came to national prominence.
** Note to GM-elect Ghasi: Are you by any chance available for the first-team match against Coulsdon on Monday? 7.30pm start and we might be able to go halves on your ticket from Clapham Junction as conditions for playing.
Kingston 2 v South Norwood 1, Surrey League division 2 match played at the Willoughby Arms, Kingston, on 14 October 2024
For the second week in a row, Kingston hosted a team from South Norwood. The result was the same as last week, when we triumphed in the first round of the Lauder Trophy, but this time it was much tighter, with three knife-edge games still being vigorously contested as the three-hour playing session drew to a close. In the end, Kingston emerged as 4.5-2.5 winners, but that relatively comfortable margin by no means tells the whole story.
IM John Hawksworth was making his league debut for Kingston on board 1 – John has returned to chess after a break of more than 30 years – and was up against a tough opponent in Marcus Osborne. The two showed each other a good deal of respect and an early draw was agreed in the position below (with Black to play). A good result for Marcus with Black; a good result for John on his return to competitive action.
Half an hour later Kingston went one up when Julian Way defeated the ever combative Ron Harris on board 3. Black blundered in the position below and ceded White a material advantage that was sufficient to win the game 15 moves later.
Peter Andrews, with Black against South Norwood captain Simon Lea on board 4, pushed Kingston further ahead with what he afterwards called (in the nicest possible way) “a very pleasant crush”.
20…Nd4And now if 21. exd4 Bxd4+ picks up the rook on a7.21.Qd1b422.Nb1Nxf3+23.Qxf3Bd523…”Qd3 would have won a piece straight away,” says Peter, “as the knight is amusingly trapped on its initial square. But White’s rook could have picked up a couple of pawns along the seventh rank, and with time running short I preferred to keep tight control.”24.Qf2Qc6“24…Be4 was even stronger. 25. d3 is necessary to save a piece, but White is two pawns down and getting squelched.”24…Be425.d3Bxd326.Rd1Ra827.Rxa8Rxa828.b328.Nd2Bc229.Rf1c330.bxc3bxc331.Nf3Be432.Nd425.d4cxd326.Nd2Ra827.Rxa8Rxa828.Nf3Ra1“White resigned. He must lose either the bishop on c1 or the knight on f3: eg 29. Bd2 Rxf1 30. Qxf1 Bxf3”.0–1
Peter’s win put Kingston 2.5-0.5 ahead and that soon became 3-1 when Alan Scrimgour and Kaddu Mukasa agreed a draw in the position below after a very solidly played game that had always been level.
David Rowson and South Norwood’s Paul Dupré also drew on board 2, but their game was more of a rollercoaster, and David felt he had let winning chances slip. “I was clearly winning after Paul played some inferior moves and I won a pawn,” David said afterwards, “but in time trouble I got confused and was glad to get a draw when I only had about 10 seconds left.”
This is the crunch position. 30…d2 here wins, whereas the move played reduces Black’s advantage greatly.30…Rd630…d231.Bb2f632.Bc3Rd3!33.f3Rxc334.Rb2Bxf335.Rbxd2Qc5+36.Kh2Bxd137.Qxc3Ba438.Rd5Qf239.Qf3Qh440.Qg4Qxg441.hxg4Bc642.Rd2Re431.Rb6!Qxb632.Qxd6Qxd632…Qb333.Ra1Qxc434.Re1h635.f3Bc636.Rxe8+Bxe837.Bb4b533.Bxd6Re634.Bf4h535.Be3h436.c5?36.f3Bf537.Kf2Ra638.c5Ra339.Rd2Rb336…Rg637.g4hxg338.f3Bxf339.Rxd3Ra6?39…Bc640.Rd8+Kh741.Rd6g242.Bf4f543.Rd3Rf644.Kh2Rf845.Rd1Ra846.Be5Ra247.h4Rf248.Kg1Rf349.h5Rh350.Kf2Rxh551.Rg1g540.Bd4Be441.Rxg3g642.h4Ra443.Bf6Ra8½–½
That made it 3.5-1.5 and we couldn’t lose the match – always reassuring. But could we win it? We thought initially that it was in the bag, but Peter Roche (back in league chess after a five-year absence) was short of time and running out of good moves on board 6, and, while Alicia Mason (pictured above) was better against South Norwood stalwart Ken Chamberlain on board 7, she was also in a time scramble. The possibility of a drawn match flickered across our collective consciousness.
Peter Roche’s game was a tragedy of sorts. He was completely level after 50 moves and in other circumstances his opponent, Ibrahim Abouchakra, would have been tempted to take a draw. But given the match situation he had to play on and, with Peter very short of time and playing a little too passively (perhaps deeming the draw inevitable), White was able to manoeuvre his king into an active position and forced the blunder which cost Peter the game. A defining moment came on Black’s 51st move, where Peter makes a slight error which allows the White king to penetrate, From there, things rapidly went downhill.
That made it 3.5-2.5, and now it was all down to Alicia Mason, making her Kingston debut with White on board 7. She did not let us down, securing the win with both players running short of time. After the game, Alicia said she felt her opponent’s key error came in the position shown below.
19…f6“This weakens Black’s light squares on the kingside and lets my knight come to h4,” says Alicia. “There may well have been a more precise way for me to carry out the attack.”20.Nh4Bh721.Qg4Kh822.Nhf5Rg823.Bd223.d5Rc824.Rec1Bf825.Nh4Be726.a4bxa427.Rxa4g623…Nb724.b4exd425.Bb3Ne5“This looks like a strong reply to 25. Bb3,” says Alicia, “and I was very surprised he didn’t follow up with 26…Nc4 to block the bishop’s diagonal.”26.Qh4g5?26…Nc427.Rad1d528.exd5Nxd229.Rxd2Bd630.Nxd4Qd731.Ne6Be532.Ne4Rgc827.Qxh6Rg628.Qh5Rc829.Be6Rc230.Rad1Bf831.Nxd4Rc732.Bf5Rgg7?“There were a lot of tempting sacrificial ideas during the game (Nxg7, N or Bxh6 etc),” says Alicia, “but none of them seemed to be quite working out. It was possible for him to avoid the loss of the exchange with 32…Rh6, though White would still retain an advantage.”32…Rh633.Qe2Qe834.Rc1Rc435.Bc3Bg836.Nf1Nd837.Ne3Rc738.Ng4Nxg439.Bxg4Bh740.Nf5Bxf541.Bxf5Qf742.Bd4Rc443.Qb233.Ne6Qe734.Nxg7Qxg735.Bxh7Qxh736.Qxh7+Kxh737.Nf5Kg638.f4“The game continued for quite a number of moves and there was a lot of shuffling,” says Alicia, “but I managed to swap off Black’s rook and two knights and win another pawn, and Ken resigned when he had a lone bishop and pawn against my rook and three pawns, two of which were connected passed pawns on the kingside.”1–0
A very satisfying start to the season in this tough division where the Kingston second team will be up against three first teams – South Norwood, Surbiton and Wimbledon – as well as a strong Guildford second team. We will need to perform as we did here in every match to ensure survival in this battlefield.
Kingston v South Norwood, Lauder Trophy first-round match played at the Willoughby Arms, Kingston on 7 October 2024
This was in the end surprisingly easy. South Norwood are canny operators in the Lauder Trophy, a knockout competition played over six boards with a maximum collective ECF rating of 10,500. That rating ceiling levels the playing field – you can’t play six highly rated players; you have to slice and dice – and South Norwood have made good use of their relatively limited resources to win it four times in the trophy’s quarter-century history. But on this occasion, their team was unusually weak, they defaulted a board and Kingston ran out emphatic 5.5-0.5 winners.
With board six already in the bag by default – a (sort of) debut victory for new Kingston junior Anqi Yang – our top two boards went to work to build on the lead. Mike Healey had White against Ron Harris, who as usual blitzed out his moves. But Mike is too strong a player to be intimidated as we lesser mortals are when faced by a very fast player who is always looking to grab the initiative. Ron made the somewhat rash decision to castle queenside in the position below, and Mike launched a ferocious attack that ended in victory after 30 moves.
David Rowson was playing South Norwood stalwart Simon Lea with Black on board 2, and the latter stumbled into a piece-losing tactic as early as the 11th move, in the position shown below.
“White has just played 11. Nd2,” said David afterwards. “My h5 bishop had clearly been annoying him. I nearly made the automatic exchange on e2, then realised that 11…exd4 won a piece. If 12. exd4 I can play Bxe2 as the e8 rook is now also on that square, and after the move he played, 12. Bxh5 dxc3, he has two pieces en prise so must end up a piece down.” The rest was, as they say, technique, which David has in abundance.11…exd412.Bxh5dxc313.Bxf7+Kxf714.Qxc3Kg815.Nf3Ne416.Qc2a517.b3Ndc518.Bb2Qe719.Nd4Qf720.Rae1g621.f3Ng322.Rf2Bg723.Bc3Ne624.Ne2Nxe2+25.Rfxe2Bxc326.Qxc3Qg727.Qc2Re728.Qd2Qe529.Qd5c630.Qxe5dxe531.Rd2Rd832.Red1Rxd233.Rxd2Kf734.Kf2Ke835.Rd6Nc536.Ke2Rd737.Rxd7Kxd70–1
South Norwood captain Ken Chamberlain held Jon Eckert to a draw on board 4 to save his side from being bagelled 6-0, but that result was enough to take Kingston over the line and confirm the victory. Joe Inch, another promising junior making his debut for the club, then scored an excellent win over the veteran Gengadharan Somupillai with White on board 5, playing confidently in a rook endgame.
Julian Way, with White on board 3 against the resourceful Ibrahim Abouchakra, played the longest and most complicated game of the night. Abouchakra played the Dragon Variation of the Sicilian Defence and was always looking to attack, but Julian kept control of the situation. In the position below he is well on top, but is a little concerned about the exposed position of his king, which might give Black hopes of mate or a perpetual. Julian finds a pragmatic way to win, winning a piece and diverting the Black queen to a defensive role. The engine, which never sees ghosts, opts for something flashier.
45.d7+45.Qh7Qa545…Bxd646.Qg8+Bf847.Nxf8Rf1+48.Kg2Rf2+49.Kg149.Kxf2Qxc5+50.Re3Qc2+51.Re2Qf5+52.Kg1Qb1+53.Kg2Kc746.d7+Kb847.Qg8+45…Qxd745…Kxd746.Qh7+Ke847.Qg8+Ke748.Qd8+Kf749.Qf8+Kg650.h5+Kxh551.Rxe5+Rf552.Qxf5+Kh653.Qh5#46.Rxe5Qe847.Qg7Rf748.Qxg4Kb849.Rg5Rf850.Rf5This is winning, but Black could also instead just take the rook. Julian, with time starting to press, may have imagined White had chances of a perpetual, but they are illusory.50.Nxf8Qe1+51.Kg2a552.Qe6Qb153.a4Ka754.Nd7Qc2+55.Kh3Qb356.Qb6+50…Rh851.Qf4+1–0
Julian’s win, on the stroke of 10.30pm and after a three-hour battle, made it 5.5-0.5, and South Norwood had to face a long and forlorn drive back to south London. The match would have been a different story if they had been at home, where they tend to be much stronger, but that’s the luck of the draw. We now face Wallington in the semi-final, and this time we have to travel to that distant location. An advance party will be setting off immediately.
Dorking 2 v Kingston 4, Surrey division 5 match played at Crossways Community Baptist Church, Dorking on 3 October 2024
Kingston has a new third- and fourth-team captain in the Surrey League – one of the most demanding roles at the club – and Edward “Ed” Mospan started his tenure with an excellent 3.5-2.5 win at Dorking in a closely fought match. The future, as we always knew it would be, is safe in Ed’s hands.
Just getting to Dorking from Kingston is a battle, especially in a week when the Great Dorking Sinkhole had made entering the town by road almost impossible. But Ed’s team managed it and proceeded to play with great aplomb.
David Shalom (pictured above, right, in action at a recent blitz tournament at All Saints church in Kingston) had a terrific success on board 1 against Pablo Telford. The game was very sharp, with David proving that the more mild-mannered a person is the more aggressive they are likely to be at the chessboard. His aggression paid dividends when his opponent went horribly wrong in the position below.
25…Kd7?? Unfortunately walking into White’s sucker punch – 26. Qh3+. The engine, which thinks Black is slightly better here, suggests25…Kf726.Qxd6Rxd627.Nf3Rc828.Re2Na829.Rxf2Rxc730.Re1Rf631.Rfe2h6and a tough endgame in which only Black might have a winning chance, though it will be far from easy.26.Qh3+1–0
David Bickerstaff also enjoyed an excellent win with Black on board 2, finding a neat tactic in the position below which as good as sealed the deal.
Aziz Sannie was the third Kingston winner on the night, with White on board 5, and Mark Sheridan got a crucial draw with Black on board 6 to ensure that Kingston went home (avoiding the sinkhole of course) with the points.
Rob Taylor lost on board 3 – we accidentally played him out of board order, but Surrey tournament controller Graham Alcock kindly forgave us the early-season slip and told us to sharpen up our act – and Captain Ed lost with Black on board 4, despite having both a time advantage and what he believed was a winning position. “If helpmate was an actual competition,” he remarked on the club’s WhatsApp group, “I would be a grandmaster.” Don’t fret about it Ed. As a person and a captain, you are already at super-GM level!
Streatham v Kingston, Alexander Cup first-round match played at St Thomas’s Church, Streatham, on 1 October 2024
In one sense this was groundhog day. We had played Streatham at exactly this time of the year last season at the same venue and come out on top by 7-3. But there were also significant differences: this was a revamped (and we hope renewed) Kingston team, with no fewer than four debutants – Peter Large, Sam Walker, Ash Stewart and Peter Hasson. We had been working through the summer to reinvigorate the squad – a team that stands still is doomed to fail – and this would be the acid test: would we be Man City, recruiting wisely, or Man United, living on past reputation?
We like to believe it is the former, though the home team fought hard to expose us as the latter. We outrated Streatham on every board and ran out 6.5-3.5 winners, but it was a tense evening nonetheless, and there were some anxious faces in the Kingston support group as 10pm approached and we started to enter time scramble territory.
The first game to finish was Julian Way’s on board 8. He was playing White against promising junior Qixuan Han, and in the following position Julian believed his opponent could have struck a critical blow. The move Julian feared was 20…c5, because of the threat from the Black queen to the pawn on g3 – the f2 pawn is pinned. The engine concurs that Black is better, but it takes a fair amount of manoeuvring to prove the advantage. As it was, Han chose a quieter line and a draw was agreed a few moves later. White has a slight advantage in the final position, but Julian was 20 minutes down on the clock and admitted his mind was still dwelling on the potential for Black of 20…c5.
Kingston’s first win came courtesy of club president John Foley on board 10. His opponent had fallen into a trap in the opening, leading to the loss of a vital pawn, and looked singularly dejected for the rest of the game. This is the game, with comments from John:
John Foley1995
Ruairi Isaacs1820
Streatham v Kingston
October 1, 2024 – St Thomas's Church, Streatham
1.d4Nf62.Nf3g63.Bf4Bg74.Nc3O-O5.Qd2?!d66.Bh6Nbd7?!6…c57.Bxg7Kxg78.O-O-Ocxd49.Nxd4Nc67.e4e58.Bxg7Kxg79.O-O-ORe810.dxe5dxe511.Bc411.h411…c6?!11…Qe712.Ng5!12…Re713.Bxf7Qa513…Rxf714.Ne6+14.Bb3Nc515.Qd8“Dominating the back rank. In the post-mortem, David Maycock also suggested this move.”15…Nxb3+?!“Although tempting, it would have been better to retain the knight to defend the d8 square.”16.axb3Qxd816…Qa1+17.Nb1!17.Rxd8Nd718.Rd1h619.Nf3“Putting pressure on the weak e-pawn.”Even better was19.Ne6+Kf720.Rd6Rb821.Rh8Rxe622.Rxd7+Bxd723.Rxb8+−19…g5?!“Black doesn’t really have a plan. This weakens the kingside.”20.h3Nf6heading for f421.Nh2Nh522.Nf1Kf7“Black is desperate to exchange the suffocating rook on d8.”23.Ne3“Threatening to jump to f5 or g4 and protecting g2.”23…Re8?!“Black removes the stranglehold, but the move loses.”24.Rxe8Kxe825.Rd6“The rook penetrates decisively.”1–0
There was more good news soon after when David Maycock defeated Streatham veteran Graham Keane’s Pirc Defence on board 2, a tremendous win which showed that David has superb positional sense as well as sharp command of tactics. He has annotated his success in the Games section.
David Maycock (left) enjoyed an impressive win on board 2 against Streatham stalwart Graham Keane
That made it to 2.5-0.5 to Kingston, and things became even better shortly afterwards when Sam Walker – one of Kingston’s new recruits and playing off a handy ECF rating of 2272 – won with Black on board 3. White had had a slight edge for most of the game after playing the English Opening, but the game swung suddenly when Sam landed a neat tactical blow in the position below. Watch how the apparently strong knight on d6 suddenly becomes a key target.
We were now 3.5-0.5 up and surely it was plain sailing. But not so fast: the team’s non-playing captain Alan Scrimgour thought we stood worse on boards 1 and 5, and Peter Andrews was under pressure on board 9. This was by no means over yet.
Sam Walker (left), flanked by Peter Lalić, recorded a vital win on board 3 on his Kingston debut
The next game to finish was on board 6, where another Kingston debutant, Peter Hasson, drew with Antony Hall. This was the key position in which Peter opted for a drawing line:
“I misplayed the opening and ended up in a slightly worse position but kept it in balance,” Peter explained afterwards. “At the end I wanted to stop Black posting a knight on c4, which is a bit awkward so used the exchanging combination starting with 24. Nxa7. If he plays 24… Bxb4, I have Nc6. I was probably slightly better at the end [a draw was a agreed a few moves later], but given the state of the match at the time I felt it simplest to secure the half-point which was close to taking us over the line.”
Peter Andrews, left, does battle with Streatham captain Martin Smith in a pivotal encounter on board 9
A good choice as it turned out, but there were wobbles on the way. On board 5, Ash Stewart was behind on time and, playing on the 10-second increment (the control was 75 minutes per player plus 10 seconds added on every move), went down fighting in a scramble. That made it 4-2. With Peter Large having the worst of it on board 1, the board 9 clash between Peter Andrews and Streatham captain Martin Smith now became crucial.
The Streatham player opted for an interesting line in the Catalan, with 7. Ne5, but Peter played accurately and established a small advantage out of the opening. Then a thunderbolt in the position below:
15.Rd6“I was stunned by this,” says Peter. “Stockfish tells me it is unsound (the evaluation changes from level to around -1), but it completely changes the nature of the position, which can be difficult to handle.”15.Rdb1Bc616.b315…Bxd616.exd6Bc6“I did not want to allow White to play e5, securing the d6 pawn, and was also mindful that the knight on b6 had no squares to go to. Bc6 made room for the knight on d7, so if White plays 17. e5 Nd7 he would not be able to win the c5 pawn. Stockfish prefers 16…f6 17 Bxc5 Ra6 18 f4 e5 19 Kf1 Kb8, with the bishop on d7 protecting the diagonal opened by f6 and e5, and Kb8 opening the way for the knight to come to c8. That is clearly a better arrangement of the pieces than mine.”16…f617.Bxc5Ra618.f4e519.Bf1Kb820.Be2Rd817.Bxc5Nd718.Be3f5“This gives up Black’s advantage,” explains Peter. “The plan was to exchange off the white e-pawn before it can come to e5, but it opens the position prematurely. 18….Ne5 was preferable.”19.Rc1h6“I wanted to be able to play Kd8 without facing Bg5+. And more generally pawns on black squares are desirable to restrict the white bishop, which has no black counterpart.”20.exf5exf521.Nd5“White now has an edge, and in time trouble it was easier to think of things I could not play than what I could. The knight on d7 cannot move because of Nb6+ winning back the exchange. If 21…Bxa4 22. Ne7+ Kd8 23. Bxb7 Rb8 24. Bc6, Black cannot exchange the bishops without allowing a knight fork. 21… Re8 to occupy the only open file allows 22. Nc7. Unsurprisingly, I ran short of time. Stockfish likes 21… Ra6, intending Bxd5 and then picking up the d6 pawn.”21…Kd8“Avoiding knight forks, but White is now winning.”21…Bxa422.Ne7+Kd823.Bxb7Rb824.Bc6Rb425.Ra122.Rxc4Ne523.Rc3Nf7“Hitting d6, and (as it turned out importantly) also guarding the rook on h8, in case White gets a chance to play a back-rank check with his rook.”24.Nb6Rb825.Bxc6bxc6“White is winning,” says Peter. “Unfortunately, this was the point at which I stopped recording [under the five-minute rule that allows a player to stop notating in a time scramble], and I cannot quite reconstruct the finish. White tried to force the d-pawn through by sacrificing his bishop, but we emerged into an endgame in which I had rook and knight versus rook, but was about to be reduced to just one kingside pawn against two kingside pawns and an a-pawn. With little time on either clock and Kingston ahead in the match, the draw was fine.”½–½
Fine indeed. Critical in fact, because just as Peter A took a draw another of our four (!) Peters, IM Peter Large, was losing to Phil Makepeace, who had played a impressively forceful game, on board 1. Had both Peters lost, it would have been 4-4 – such are the fine margins in team chess. As it was, we were still ahead by 4.5-3.5, so another point would do it (having lost on board 1, which counts for 10 points in the event of a tie, the higher maths of board count in the event of the match ending 5-5 did not appeal).
We were now confident David Rowson was winning on board 7, though he said later he was nervous of blundering away his advantage in a long-drawn-out endgame. But as so often it was Peter Lalić who took us over the line. His game on board 4 against Matthew Tillett was closely contested, but, with time and the pressure of the match situation no doubt taking their toll, his opponent blundered in the position below in which Black’s bishop on d4 is directing affairs.
30…Rb8?? This move, presumably designed to stop the white king advancing on the all-important a-pawn, ignores the imminent danger to Black’s king and transforms the position from tricky to terminal. The eagle-eyed Lalić does not miss such opportunities. Black should play either 30…Rf8 or 30…Bxg2 (my engine seems incapable of deciding which route is better). Both lead to potentially unpleasant endgames in which White retains an edge, but Black retains some drawing chances.31.Nh5Bxg232.Rf2Nh433.Nf6+Kg734.Nd7+1–0
That made it a match-winning 5.5-3.5 to Kingston, and David Rowson on board 7 duly added the point that made the win look a little more comfortable than it really was. David’s victory came courtesy of the “nervy endgame” he described, but the game had really been decided by the middlegame sequence shown below.
24.Be3? White should instead look to neutralise Black’s bishop.24.c5b625.Rc2bxc526.bxc5Red827.Be3c624…Bxe325.fxe3Qb626.c5Qxb427.Qg4Qa328.Rb1Rxe329.Qd7Rxe1+30.Rxe1Qxc5+31.Kh1Qe732.Qd5c633.Qb3Black is three pawns up and winning comfortably, though White played on long into the night.0–1
We got back to Kingston close to midnight, but it was worth it. A potential banana skin – Streatham are a very well-run club with a powerful squad of players – had been sidestepped, and the pursuit of our fourth successive Alexander Cup was successfully launched. Next up, probably in the New Year, dangerous wannabes Epsom. Even now, Epsom President Marcus Gosling – the Ernst Stavro Blofeld of Surrey chess – will be plotting our downfall from his heavily fortified lair somewhere on the North Downs.