Kingston v Guildford, final of the Alexander Cup, played at the Peace Memorial Hall, Ashtead on 29 April 2025

From left: Ameet Ghasi, David Maycock, Vladimir Li, Luca Buanne, John Hawksworth, Peter Large, Michael Healey, Silverio Abasolo, Peter Lalić, Ash Stewart (photograph: John Foley)

The all-conquering Kingston team comfortably retained the Alexander Cup by winning the final at Ashtead against Guildford. The Alexander Cup is the 10-board Surrey teams open knockout championship. In reaching the final, Kingston defeated Streatham in the quarter-final 6.5-3.5 and Epsom in the semi-final 8.5-1.5 and so were odds-on favourites. However, Guildford should never be underestimated as they have a large pool of players to call upon and were the holders prior to the present Kingston run.

The Kingston team had a grandmaster on top board and an international master on bottom board. This team could acquit itself well in any English team event, including the 4NCL where several of these players are active in the first division.

The match was played at Ashtead as a neutral venue. We are grateful to Bertie Barlow and Ashtead Chess Club for facilitating the event. To add to the drama, Kingston was also playing another final in the same venue – the Lauder Trophy, which is the ratings-limited six-board Surrey team knockout tournament. We had got through to both finals. A report on the Lauder Trophy is published separately. John Foley was captain of the Alexander Cup team and Stephen Moss captain of the Lauder Trophy team. Graham Alcock, the Surrey inter-club tournament director, also attended and made the presentations to the winners.

Considerable effort went into the logistics of the event. Each player’s travel arrangements were checked and double-checked. There is little that can be done about a seven-car pile-up on the A3, so some of us arrived only just in time for the 7.40pm start. Kingston took our own chess equipment (thanks to Stephen Moss) so as not to impose on Ashtead. We were joined by two supporters – David Rowson, captain of Kingston’s Thames Valley first team, who would normally be playing, and Robert Waller, whose playing days are behind him but who enjoys attending matches. It was the hottest day of the year so far and temperatures were in the mid-20Cs. We picked up packs of bottled water from the local Co-op.

The room got warmer as the evening progressed and the tension mounted. Kingston never looked in trouble from the moment of the first point – a quick win on board 9 by Luca Buanne, who could then switch to doing his homework.

Kingston obtained seven wins and two draws. In this match report we look at three games. We hope to publish some of the remaining games in our Games section. The most spectacular game which caught the attention of those present was between Silverio Abasolo and James Toon. As one spectator asked Alan Scrimgour, “How can Silverio have nearly all his pieces under attack?” to which the reply was “Well, his opponent can only take one piece at a time!”

Board 7

In Silverio’s game, each side landed blows on the other and we could not guess what was going to happen. The outcome of Peter Lalić’s game was unpredictable because it depended upon whether he had enough compensation for his Smith-Morra gambit. He gave up one pawn, another pawn and then the exchange. However, Peter was thinking at a deeper level than the spectators, and eventually his strategy of tight control proved victorious.

Board 5

Board 3

Meanwhile on Board 3, there was no uncertainty. Peter Large dispatched Nigel Povah efficiently with a neat queen sacrifice.

The first and second teams played at the Holiday Inn, Coventry. The third team played in Peterborough on the third 4NCL weekend 15/16 February 2025

From left: front: Nia Videnova, David Maycock, Ash Stewart; back: Viviana Galvan Cipriani, Ulysse Bottazzi, Peter Finn, Liwia Jarocka, Vladyslav Larkin (Photograph: John Foley)

The 4NCL is the national chess league which is played one game per day over five weekends at hotels in central England. Divisions 1 and 2 comprise 12 teams – eight players in division 1, six in division 2. Division 3 is split into two groups of 12 teams, with six players in each. Division 4 has 32 many teams of six players. Kingston has teams in Divisions 1, 3 and 4. The team is called CSC/Kingston to reflect the aspiration that we provide a pipeline for those learning under the Chess in Schools and Communities project.

This was the third weekend and marks the halfway point of the season. It was make or break this weekend, and we proved ourselves up to the challenge. We were short-handed because some of our players were on international duty for England at the World Senior Team championships in Prague. Peter Large is in the 65+ first team, Clive Frostick is in the 50+ second team, and his wife Helen is in the women’s team. We were also missing players from our second team – Chris Fegan for England and Alan Scrimgour for Scotland. Nonetheless, we have a strong squad and others were drafted in.

The Kingston team is newly promoted and battling to survive at the top flight of British chess. During the first two weekends, we had won just one out of four matches. However, most of these opponents were from the “elite” group of first-division teams. We won against Alba which, although the top Scottish team, was not quite at the elite level. So we had not given up hope of survival.

Division 1 Round 5

The first match this third weekend was against the formidable Wood Green, a sponsored team which has won the title on many occasions. They outrated us on every board and the final defeat by 3-5 was within our expectations. Six of the games were drawn and we lost only two. This proved that we were able to slug it out with the elite.

One factor in our favour for the longer term is that the average age of our team is only 19 years old. We are much younger than the soi-disant “Wood Green Youth” team, whose teeth are getting long. Past players for our CSC/Kingston team (the fluctuating history of the team will be told one day) were the then teenagers Matthew Wadsworth and Harry Grieve, both of whom have now graduated to bigger teams.

Division 1 Round 6

After the loss, the team repaired to the Hungry Horse to lift our spirits. This had the desired effect because the next morning the team arrived fresh and creative to face the strong Barnet Knights A team. Barnet Knights have been a mainstay of junior coaching in north London and their talented protégés were participating, including the Badacsonyi brothers. We were delighted to see Stanley, who was a joint winner of the Kingston Invitational last summer.

This result marked the “coming of age” of the Kingston team according to an exultant tweet from Kingston club captain Stephen Moss, who had decamped to Florida. He loyally left aside the attractions of sun, sea and beach and hung on the live results feed from 4NCL. We were a shade outrated but by less than in the previous round. The first game to finish was from Ulysse Bottazzi, who made short work of his international master opponent as if in compensation for his quick loss the previous day. Peter Finn had two extra pawns against Ethan Pang, but both sides had two rooks which made progress very slow but he got there in the end.

The league table shows we are now fourth from the bottom, which crucially is just above the cut-off point for demotion back down to the second division. A decade ago, I captained a team which had just been promoted to the first division, and my policy was to reward the players who had won promotion for their loyalty and devotion by retaining them in the team. They had the pleasure of playing some of the best players in the country, if not Europe. Whilst this policy had ethical merits, it led to our immediate demotion. The competitive reality is that to survive after promotion it is necessary to strengthen the team, which is what we have done this season.

Division 3 Round 5

Turning now to our second team, which was on 3/4 after two weekends, our only loss being to Sussex Martlets 1, which is the strongest team in the division and top of the table. As mentioned, we were shorthanded as some of our players were on international duties. To make matters worse, at the very last minute, after the pairings against The Rookies, one of our players pulled out due to illness. Defaulting a game is a serious matter in the 4NCL, losing not just the game, but also suffering a penalty point and possibly a financial penalty. Fortunately, Gerhard Bezuidenhout, the father of one of our first-team players, stepped into the breach and, although he lost quickly, he saved the penalties.

This was an excellent victory 4-2 against a slightly higher-rated team. I wondered if they were members of the Stephen Moss fan club named eponymously for The Rookie, his book ruminating on the chess world. Alas, he could not be present to give a speech. After the match, the team tracked to the Hungry Horse for dinner with the first team. The social aspects of team morale cannot be underestimated.

Division 3 Round 6

The morning train from London to Coventry brought our Sunday substitute, Giampiero Amato, who eschewed the offer of a lift to take the No 9 bus from the station. One has to admire his faith in public transport, but it doesn’t do much for the captain’s blood pressure. We swapped the bottom board from the first team and the top board of our second team partly to keep our opponents MK Phoenix guessing.

The team cruised to another victory. Giampiero won a piece in the early middle game and could get the next train back. Ewan Wilson notched up his second point of the weekend. Zain Patel obtained a draw on board 1, as did Viviana Galvan Cipriani on board 2. Tom Farrand was under attack for most of the game, but when the smoke cleared he was the exchange up in the endgame and won.

The games have yet to be published on the 4NCL website at the time of writing so I will mention mine. I had overreached, losing a pawn. I was on the wrong side of a R+P v R ending. It looked ominous, but the game ended curiously. I had been continually checking my opponent’s king from the rear, not allowing any time for the pawn to be promoted. I offered a draw and, to my surprise, my opponent accepted, which was quite a relief. The scoresheets were signed. Our team-mates on both sides subsequently queried whether the position was really drawn. They were right of course – the position was lost.

The second team’s hopes of promotion were greatly increased this weekend with two victories. We are third in the table. Our match against second-placed ToBeDecided will be critical.

Division 4

The third team were playing a Peterborough, which meant that I was unable to learn much more than the match results. The vibe was very positive, with match wins on both days. Chris Rice and Harry Evans both scored a brace.

Division 4 Round 5

Division 4 Round 6

It was an excellent weekend, with five match victories out ofsix. Kingston are definitely contenders for promotion from Divisions 3 and 4 and to avoid demotion from Division 1. Most of the credit should be given to Kate Cooke, who organises the entire squad and was there for all the crucial moments such as dropouts and replacements, logistics and transfers. It really is a team effort.

John Foley

Kingston v Epsom, Alexander Cup semi-final 10-board match played at the Willoughby Arms, Kingston on 5 February 2025

Photographs from John Saunders unless captioned otherwise

Match report from Kingston match captain John Foley

See also match report from Marcus Gosling of Epsom Chess Club

Kingston, the clear favourites, won the semi-final of the Alexander Cup, the Surrey team knockout championship, by a wide margin but were full of admiration for the youthful Epsom team. At one point during the evening, the balance of the match was evenly poised. The 8½–1½ result flatters Kingston because the games were much closer.

The match started with a one-minute silence following the sad news of the death of Stewart Reuben. Most of those present would not have known Stewart, so I have posted a short blog about his enormous contribution to chess.

Board 4: Chris Wright (Epsom) v Mike Healey (Kingston) [1-0]

The first game to finish was at 9pm when Mike Healey trapped the queen of Chris Wright, a former Kingstonian. Sometimes it is easier to capture an unsuspecting queen rather than a well-defended king. The full brevity may may have some instructional value.

The final position

Board 10: Alan Bates (Epsom) v David Rowson (Kingston) [2-0]

As the match progressed, the game positions became harder to judge and the ratings advantage of Kingston seemed to count for naught. It was not until 10pm that the next result came from David Rowson. His opponent, Alan Bates, even though massively outrated, held the advantage for most of the game. Unfortunately, the game ended suddenly when Alan retreated his threatened knight to the wrong square.

The white knight under attack moved to the middle of the board 30. Ne4? but this lost to 30. Nd3 attacking the white queen whilst revealing an attack on the Ne4. White resigned immediately. The saving move would have been 30. Na6!, which goes against the usual advice that knights should not be placed on the edge of the board. However, the Na6 cannot be captured because White has counterplay, eg pin and win the black knight or else give the knight an escape on c7 with Qg3.

A quarter of an hour later came a flurry of results with Ash Stewart, Luca Buanne, Peter Andrews and Peter Lalić all winning and Will Taylor settling for a draw. Kingston had won the match.

Board 5: Ash Stewart (Kingston) v Marcus Gosling (Epsom) [3-0]

Ash Stewart played White against Epsom team captain Marcus Gosling in a Classical Catalan and accurately built up the pressure. Marcus, a man of action not content with a defensive posture, boldly opened the position – unfortunately to his own detriment and soon Ash had doubled rooks on the seventh rank.

Here Marcus played 26…b4 forking the rook and knight. Ash gratefully grabbed the Bc7. Black had no further counterplay after capturing the knight on a3. I glanced at the board at this point and wondered if Black could give up the c7 bishop 26…Bxf4 prior to playing the b4 fork on the desperado principle. Although White still has the advantage, at least Black would have an extra pawn compared to the game.

Board 7: Luca Buanne (Kingston) v Lev Razhnou (Epsom) [4-0]

This game always looked positive for Kingston. Lev doubled his rooks on the g-file hoping for a breakthrough. Meanwhile Luca had a free hand on the other side of the board and grabbed some pawns. Eventually Lev had to give up the exchange resulting in a RR v NR ending which Luca successfully navigated.

Board 6: Arnav Kumar (Epsom) v John Hawksworth (Kingston) [4½-½]

The best Epsom result of the evening was achieved by Arnav Kumar, who drew against an international master. His brother Sachin also drew on board 8. These two brothers are a formidable addition to the Epsom squad. John Hawksworth was disappointed with the result, but credited his opponent for a very resourceful tactical defence.

Board 9: Peter Andrews (Kingston) v Maya Keen (Epsom) [5½-½]

Peter Andrews essayed the English against Maya Keen who replied with the Agincourt Defence. Maya came out of the opening with a solid position, but ambitiously sacrificed a knight and a bishop for a rook and a pawn – an exchange which is usually regarded as disadvantageous. Peter entered the endgame with his two bishops dominating Maya’s rook. Maya, with her mother sitting behind lending moral support, put up a good fight in the ending time scramble. Peter visibly suffers from nerves under time pressure but managed to steer the game to a successful conclusion. One interesting point about the game is that although the sacrifice was unsound, so was Peter’s reply.

After 18…Bxf2+, White played 19. Rxf2 automatically but should instead have played 19. Kh1! This quiet retreat wins a piece for two pawns because Black cannot save both the Ne4 and the Bf2. Peter expressed some embarrassment afterwards at missing this elementary tactic. It underlines the point that a won game is not exempt from error. Indeed, the dictum that one learns from one’s losses should be replaced by the dictum that one learns from all one’s games.

Board 3: Peter Lalić (Kingston) v Robin Haldane (Epsom) [6½-½]

Peter Lalić is a chess magician: his openings are passive: he tries to exchange queens early and he doesn’t mind losing tempi as his knights retreat to their starting square. Yet, all of a sudden, through a mysterious sequence of pointless moves, he is suddenly in a winning position. The reader will be pleased to know that this did not happen on this occasion – Robin Haldane did not allow Peter’s Mieses Opening to mesmerise him. Robin, a veteran of the Surrey league, played positionally gaining the upper hand. This is where the second part of Peter’s strategy comes into play – his opponents take so long to figure out what’s going on that their clock runs down. In the diagram below, Robin is a good pawn ahead and his rooks are actively placed. However, by now he was playing on the 10-second increment, which is no friend of accuracy.

Black saw a chance to simplify the game and exchange knights and so played 37…Nf5?? Unfortunately this knight had been doing a vital defensive job protecting the d5 square. Peter instantly lashed out 38. Rd5+ forking the king and rook. Game over.

Board 8: Sachin Kumar (Epsom) v Will Taylor (Kingston) [7–1]

Will Taylor seemed to be cruising towards victory when he was tempted to place his rook in the heart of enemy territory. It looked crushing but he had overlooked a tactic which his young opponent found. We join the game at the critical moment.

As usual, the top two boards were still slugging it out. Zain Patel had an advantage over David Maycock, who was playing on the increment in the endgame. However, David’s accuracy proved decisive. The final game to finish was the IM encounter on board 1 between the old adversaries Peter Large and Graeme Buckley. Peter played 1. d4 for the first time in 40 years and a defensive game drifted into an insipid rook endgame and an agreed draw.

Board 2: Zain Patel (Epsom) v David Maycock (Kingston) [8-1]

Zain knows Kingston well, playing for us in the 4NCL and having played against us previously. He had the confidence of managing to draw with David Maycock the previous week although he had lost to him last year in the final of the Lauder Cup. Zain played the solid Colle System, which led to an equal game. David thought too hard about finding a way to punish such a dull opening and ended up having to play on the increment from move 18. By the end, both players were playing within 10 seconds each. Inevitably mistakes were made. Zain had chances to reduce the position to a theoretical draw.

Board 1: Peter Large (Kingston) v Graeme Buckley (Epsom) [8½-1½ ]

The encounter on top board between two international masters was a dull affair, with neither side conceding an inch. In the end, each player had a rook and three pawns on the same side. A draw could have been agreed at almost any point during the game.

The final

Kingston march on to our fourth final in as many years. Epsom last reached the final of the Alexander Cup in 1939. Only two teams have won four in a row – Mitcham and Redhill. Will Kingston share in this illustrious honour? The final against Guildford (to be played at Ashtead on Tuesday 29 April) should be a very competitive match.

John Foley, Kingston Alexander Cup captain