Kingston v Epsom, Alexander Cup semi-final 10-board match played at the Willoughby Arms, Kingston on 5 February 2025
Photographs from John Saunders unless captioned otherwise
Match report from Kingston match captain John Foley
See also match report from Marcus Gosling of Epsom Chess Club
Kingston, the clear favourites, won the semi-final of the Alexander Cup, the Surrey team knockout championship, by a wide margin but were full of admiration for the youthful Epsom team. At one point during the evening, the balance of the match was evenly poised. The 8½–1½ result flatters Kingston because the games were much closer.
The match started with a one-minute silence following the sad news of the death of Stewart Reuben. Most of those present would not have known Stewart, so I have posted a short blog about his enormous contribution to chess.
Board 4: Chris Wright (Epsom) v Mike Healey (Kingston) [1-0]
The first game to finish was at 9pm when Mike Healey trapped the queen of Chris Wright, a former Kingstonian. Sometimes it is easier to capture an unsuspecting queen rather than a well-defended king. The full brevity may may have some instructional value.
The final position
Board 10: Alan Bates (Epsom) v David Rowson (Kingston) [2-0]
As the match progressed, the game positions became harder to judge and the ratings advantage of Kingston seemed to count for naught. It was not until 10pm that the next result came from David Rowson. His opponent, Alan Bates, even though massively outrated, held the advantage for most of the game. Unfortunately, the game ended suddenly when Alan retreated his threatened knight to the wrong square.
The white knight under attack moved to the middle of the board 30. Ne4? but this lost to 30. Nd3 attacking the white queen whilst revealing an attack on the Ne4. White resigned immediately. The saving move would have been 30. Na6!, which goes against the usual advice that knights should not be placed on the edge of the board. However, the Na6 cannot be captured because White has counterplay, eg pin and win the black knight or else give the knight an escape on c7 with Qg3.
A quarter of an hour later came a flurry of results with Ash Stewart, Luca Buanne, Peter Andrews and Peter Lalić all winning and Will Taylor settling for a draw. Kingston had won the match.
Board 5: Ash Stewart (Kingston) v Marcus Gosling (Epsom) [3-0]
Ash Stewart played White against Epsom team captain Marcus Gosling in a Classical Catalan and accurately built up the pressure. Marcus, a man of action not content with a defensive posture, boldly opened the position – unfortunately to his own detriment and soon Ash had doubled rooks on the seventh rank.
Here Marcus played 26…b4 forking the rook and knight. Ash gratefully grabbed the Bc7. Black had no further counterplay after capturing the knight on a3. I glanced at the board at this point and wondered if Black could give up the c7 bishop 26…Bxf4 prior to playing the b4 fork on the desperado principle. Although White still has the advantage, at least Black would have an extra pawn compared to the game.
Board 7: Luca Buanne (Kingston) v Lev Razhnou (Epsom) [4-0]
This game always looked positive for Kingston. Lev doubled his rooks on the g-file hoping for a breakthrough. Meanwhile Luca had a free hand on the other side of the board and grabbed some pawns. Eventually Lev had to give up the exchange resulting in a RR v NR ending which Luca successfully navigated.
Board 6: Arnav Kumar (Epsom) v John Hawksworth (Kingston) [4½-½]
The best Epsom result of the evening was achieved by Arnav Kumar, who drew against an international master. His brother Sachin also drew on board 8. These two brothers are a formidable addition to the Epsom squad. John Hawksworth was disappointed with the result, but credited his opponent for a very resourceful tactical defence.
Board 9: Peter Andrews (Kingston) v Maya Keen (Epsom) [5½-½]
Peter Andrews essayed the English against Maya Keen who replied with the Agincourt Defence. Maya came out of the opening with a solid position, but ambitiously sacrificed a knight and a bishop for a rook and a pawn – an exchange which is usually regarded as disadvantageous. Peter entered the endgame with his two bishops dominating Maya’s rook. Maya, with her mother sitting behind lending moral support, put up a good fight in the ending time scramble. Peter visibly suffers from nerves under time pressure but managed to steer the game to a successful conclusion. One interesting point about the game is that although the sacrifice was unsound, so was Peter’s reply.
After 18…Bxf2+, White played 19. Rxf2 automatically but should instead have played 19. Kh1! This quiet retreat wins a piece for two pawns because Black cannot save both the Ne4 and the Bf2. Peter expressed some embarrassment afterwards at missing this elementary tactic. It underlines the point that a won game is not exempt from error. Indeed, the dictum that one learns from one’s losses should be replaced by the dictum that one learns from all one’s games.
Board 3: Peter Lalić (Kingston) v Robin Haldane (Epsom) [6½-½]
Peter Lalić is a chess magician: his openings are passive: he tries to exchange queens early and he doesn’t mind losing tempi as his knights retreat to their starting square. Yet, all of a sudden, through a mysterious sequence of pointless moves, he is suddenly in a winning position. The reader will be pleased to know that this did not happen on this occasion – Robin Haldane did not allow Peter’s Mieses Opening to mesmerise him. Robin, a veteran of the Surrey league, played positionally gaining the upper hand. This is where the second part of Peter’s strategy comes into play – his opponents take so long to figure out what’s going on that their clock runs down. In the diagram below, Robin is a good pawn ahead and his rooks are actively placed. However, by now he was playing on the 10-second increment, which is no friend of accuracy.
Black saw a chance to simplify the game and exchange knights and so played 37…Nf5?? Unfortunately this knight had been doing a vital defensive job protecting the d5 square. Peter instantly lashed out 38. Rd5+ forking the king and rook. Game over.
Board 8: Sachin Kumar (Epsom) v Will Taylor (Kingston) [7–1]
Will Taylor seemed to be cruising towards victory when he was tempted to place his rook in the heart of enemy territory. It looked crushing but he had overlooked a tactic which his young opponent found. We join the game at the critical moment.
As usual, the top two boards were still slugging it out. Zain Patel had an advantage over David Maycock, who was playing on the increment in the endgame. However, David’s accuracy proved decisive. The final game to finish was the IM encounter on board 1 between the old adversaries Peter Large and Graeme Buckley. Peter played 1. d4 for the first time in 40 years and a defensive game drifted into an insipid rook endgame and an agreed draw.
Board 2: Zain Patel (Epsom) v David Maycock (Kingston) [8-1]
Zain knows Kingston well, playing for us in the 4NCL and having played against us previously. He had the confidence of managing to draw with David Maycock the previous week although he had lost to him last year in the final of the Lauder Cup. Zain played the solid Colle System, which led to an equal game. David thought too hard about finding a way to punish such a dull opening and ended up having to play on the increment from move 18. By the end, both players were playing within 10 seconds each. Inevitably mistakes were made. Zain had chances to reduce the position to a theoretical draw.
Board 1: Peter Large (Kingston) v Graeme Buckley (Epsom) [8½-1½ ]
The encounter on top board between two international masters was a dull affair, with neither side conceding an inch. In the end, each player had a rook and three pawns on the same side. A draw could have been agreed at almost any point during the game.
The final
Kingston march on to our fourth final in as many years. Epsom last reached the final of the Alexander Cup in 1939. Only two teams have won four in a row – Mitcham and Redhill. Will Kingston share in this illustrious honour? The final against Guildford (to be played before the end of April) should be a very competitive match.
